Literature DB >> 17100853

Repetition suppression of induced gamma band responses is eliminated by task switching.

Thomas Gruber1, Claire-Marie Giabbiconi, Nelson J Trujillo-Barreto, Matthias M Müller.   

Abstract

The formation of cortical object representations requires the activation of cell assemblies, correlated by induced oscillatory bursts of activity > 20 Hz (induced gamma band responses; iGBRs). One marker of the functional dynamics within such cell assemblies is the suppression of iGBRs elicited by repeated stimuli. This effect is commonly interpreted as a signature of 'sharpening' processes within cell-assemblies, which are behaviourally mirrored in repetition priming effects. The present study investigates whether the sharpening of primed objects is an automatic consequence of repeated stimulus processing, or whether it depends on task demands. Participants performed either a 'living/non-living' or a 'bigger/smaller than a shoebox' classification on repeated pictures of everyday objects. We contrasted repetition-related iGBR effects after the same task was used for initial and repeated presentations (no-switch condition) with repetitions after a task-switch occurred (switch condition). Furthermore, we complemented iGBR analysis by examining other brain responses known to be modulated by repetition-related memory processes (evoked gamma oscillations and event-related potentials; ERPs). The results obtained for the 'no-switch' condition replicated previous findings of repetition suppression of iGBRs at 200-300 ms after stimulus onset. Source modelling showed that this effect was distributed over widespread cortical areas. By contrast, after a task-switch no iGBR suppression was found. We concluded that iGBRs reflect the sharpening of a cell assembly only within the same task. After a task switch the complete object representation is reactivated. The ERP (220-380 ms) revealed suppression effects independent of task demands in bilateral posterior areas and might indicate correlates of repetition priming in perceptual structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17100853     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05130.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  7 in total

Review 1.  Dynamic causal modeling for EEG and MEG.

Authors:  Stefan J Kiebel; Marta I Garrido; Rosalyn Moran; Chun-Chuan Chen; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Repeated stimuli elicit diminished high-gamma electrocorticographic responses.

Authors:  Anna Rodriguez Merzagora; Thomas J Coffey; Michael R Sperling; Ashwini Sharan; Brian Litt; Gordon Baltuch; Joshua Jacobs
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  GABAB receptor-mediated, layer-specific synaptic plasticity reorganizes gamma-frequency neocortical response to stimulation.

Authors:  Matthew Ainsworth; Shane Lee; Marcus Kaiser; Jennifer Simonotto; Nancy J Kopell; Miles A Whittington
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Timing of repetition suppression of event-related potentials to unattended objects.

Authors:  Gabor Stefanics; Jakob Heinzle; István Czigler; Elia Valentini; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Effect of the side of presentation in the visual field on phase-locked and nonphase-locked alpha and gamma responses.

Authors:  Esteban Sarrias-Arrabal; Ruben Martín-Clemente; Alejandro Galvao-Carmona; María Luisa Benítez-Lugo; Manuel Vázquez-Marrufo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Directed cortical information flow during human object recognition: analyzing induced EEG gamma-band responses in brain's source space.

Authors:  Gernot G Supp; Alois Schlögl; Nelson Trujillo-Barreto; Matthias M Müller; Thomas Gruber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Rapid processing of neutral and angry expressions within ongoing facial stimulus streams: Is it all about isolated facial features?

Authors:  Antonio Schettino; Emanuele Porcu; Christopher Gundlach; Christian Keitel; Matthias M Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.