Literature DB >> 17100684

Precision of QT interval measurement by advanced electrocardiographic equipment.

Katerina Hnatkova1, Yi Gang, Velislav N Batchvarov, Marek Malik.   

Abstract

The costs of clinical investigations of drug-induced QT interval prolongation are mainly related to manual processing of electrocardiographic (ECG) recordings. Potentially, however, these costs can be decreased by automatic ECG measurement. To investigate the improvements in measurement accuracy of the modern ECG equipment, this study investigated QT interval measurement by the "old" and "new" versions of the 12SL ECG algorithm by GE Healthcare (Milwaukee, WI, USA) and compared the results to carefully validated and reconciled manual measurements. The investigation used two sets (A and B) of ECG recordings that originated from large clinical studies. Sets A and B consisted of 15,194, and 29,866 10-second ECG recordings, respectively. All the recordings were obtained with GE Healthcare recorders and were available in digital format compatible with ECG processing software by GE Healthcare. The two sets of recordings differed significantly in ECG quality with set B being substantially more noise polluted. Compared to careful manual QT interval readings in recording set A, the errors of the automatic QT interval measurement were (mean +/- SD) +3.95 +/- 5.50 ms, and +0.51 +/- 12.41 ms for the "new" and "old" 12SL algorithm, respectively. In recording set B, these numbers were +2.41 +/- 9.47 ms, and -0.17 +/- 14.89 ms, respectively (both differences were highly statistically significant, P < 0.000001). In recording set A, 95.9% and 76.6% of ECGs were measured automatically within 10 ms of the manual measurement by the "new" and "old" versions of the 12SL algorithm, In recording set B, these numbers were 83.9% and 59.5%. The errors made by the "new" and "old" version of 12SL algorithm were practically independent each of the other (correlation coefficients of 0.031 and 0.281 in recording sets A and B, respectively). The study shows that (a) compared to the "old" version of the 12SL algorithm, the QT interval measurement by the "new" version implemented in the most recent ECG equipment by GE Healthcare is significantly better, and (b) the precision of automatic measurement by the 12SL algorithm is substantially dependent on the quality of processed ECG recordings. The improved accuracy of the "new" 12SL algorithm makes it feasible to use modern ECG equipment without any manual intervention in selected parts of drug-development program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17100684     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00532.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  21 in total

1.  [Perioperative monitoring of the QT interval].

Authors:  H Pfizenmayer; P Friederich
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Automated QT measurement and application to detection of moxifloxacin-induced changes.

Authors:  David W Mortara
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Robust QT interval estimation--from algorithm to validation.

Authors:  Joel Q Xue
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 4.  Thorough QT Studies: Questions and Quandaries.

Authors:  Marek Malik; Christine E Garnett; Joanne Zhang
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Drug induced QT prolongation: the measurement and assessment of the QT interval in clinical practice.

Authors:  Geoffrey K Isbister; Colin B Page
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Short-term repeatability of electrocardiographic Tpeak-Tend and QT intervals.

Authors:  Kapuaola S Gellert; Pentti Rautaharju; Michelle L Snyder; Eric A Whitsel; Kunihiro Matsushita; Gerardo Heiss; Elsayed Z Soliman
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 1.438

Review 7.  QT Prolongation and Malignant Arrhythmia: How Serious a Problem?

Authors:  Christos-Konstantinos Antoniou; Polychronis Dilaveris; Panagiota Manolakou; Spyridon Galanakos; Nikolaos Magkas; Konstantinos Gatzoulis; Dimitrios Tousoulis
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2017-12

8.  Circadian and gender effects on repolarization in healthy adults: a study using harmonic regression analysis.

Authors:  Kenneth A Mayuga; Emil Thattassery; Taresh Taneja; Juhana Karha; Haris Subacius; Jeffrey Goldberger; Alan Kadish
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.468

9.  Not another formula for heart rate correction of QT interval.

Authors:  Peter J Bourdillon
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 10.  Sex differences in cardiac autonomic regulation and in repolarisation electrocardiography.

Authors:  Peter Smetana; Marek Malik
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.657

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.