Literature DB >> 17097851

Sources of error in computerized neuropsychological assessment.

Alison N Cernich1, David M Brennana, Linsey M Barker, Joseph Bleiberg.   

Abstract

Computerized neuropsychological assessment has integrated slowly into research and practice since the introduction of the personal computer. Though initial integration of technology to the laboratory and clinical setting utilized specialized hardware and software, newer generation assessment tools are integrated with "off-the-shelf" operating systems. Further, neuropsychological assessment is beginning to find Internet-based application for remote assessment. As these applications are more broadly applied, it is essential to understand potential errors that can be created both in test administration and in reaction time measurement due to hardware and software interactions. In this article, user considerations are specifically addressed for resident and Internet-enabled assessment software. Potential hardware and software conflicts are defined and potential remediation is suggested. Computerized assessment is a valuable tool for neuropsychologists as long as it is used responsibly with an understanding of the potential technical complications.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17097851     DOI: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0887-6177            Impact factor:   2.813


  30 in total

Review 1.  Administration and environment considerations in computer-based sports-concussion assessment.

Authors:  Annalise A M Rahman-Filipiak; John L Woodard
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 2.  Computerized neurocognitive testing in the management of sport-related concussion: an update.

Authors:  Jacob E Resch; Michael A McCrea; C Munro Cullum
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 3.  Neuropsychological Test Administration by Videoconference: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Timothy W Brearly; Robert D Shura; Sarah L Martindale; Rory A Lazowski; David D Luxton; Brian V Shenal; Jared A Rowland
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 7.444

4.  Computerized neuropsychological assessment devices: joint position paper of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology and the National Academy of Neuropsychology.

Authors:  Russell M Bauer; Grant L Iverson; Alison N Cernich; Laurence M Binder; Ronald M Ruff; Richard I Naugle
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.813

5.  Comparison of PC and iPad administrations of the Cogstate Brief Battery in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging: Assessing cross-modality equivalence of computerized neuropsychological tests.

Authors:  Nikki H Stricker; Emily S Lundt; Kelly K Edwards; Mary M Machulda; Walter K Kremers; Rosebud O Roberts; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Michelle M Mielke
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 3.535

6.  Computerized neuropsychological assessment devices: joint position paper of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology and the National Academy of Neuropsychology.

Authors:  Russell M Bauer; Grant L Iverson; Alison N Cernich; Laurence M Binder; Ronald M Ruff; Richard I Naugle
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.535

7.  Computerized neurocognitive test performance in schizophrenia: a lifespan analysis.

Authors:  Farzin Irani; Colleen M Brensinger; Jan Richard; Monica E Calkins; Paul J Moberg; Waren Bilker; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.105

Review 8.  Challenges and opportunities for genomic developmental neuropsychology: examples from the Penn-Drexel collaborative battery.

Authors:  Ruben C Gur; Farzin Irani; Sarah Seligman; Monica E Calkins; Jan Richard; Raquel E Gur
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.535

9.  Reliability concerns in the repeated computerized assessment of attention in children.

Authors:  T Andrew Zabel; Christian von Thomsen; Carolyn Cole; Rebecca Martin; E Mark Mahone
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 3.535

10.  Practice effects distort translational validity estimates for a Neurocognitive Battery.

Authors:  Ibtihal Ibrahim; Salwa Tobar; Mai Elassy; Hader Mansour; Kehui Chen; Joel Wood; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur; Wafaa El Bahaei; Vishwajit Nimgaonkar
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.