Literature DB >> 17097846

Number of positive lymph nodes independently affects long-term survival after resection in patients with ampullary carcinoma.

J Sakata1, Y Shirai, T Wakai, N Yokoyama, E Sakata, K Akazawa, K Hatakeyama.   

Abstract

AIM: The nodal status is an established prognostic factor in ampullary carcinoma. The aim of this study was to compare the prognostic power of the anatomic location of positive nodes with that of the number of positive nodes.
METHODS: Of 73 consecutive patients treated for ampullary carcinoma, 62 underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with regional lymphadenectomy. A survival analysis of these 62 patients by nodal status was conducted retrospectively. A total of 1942 lymph nodes taken from the patients were examined histologically for metastasis. The location of positive regional nodes was classified into 4 categories, according to the Japanese staging system. The number of positive regional nodes was recorded for each patient. The median follow-up period was 124 months.
RESULTS: Nodal disease was found in 31 patients, of whom 23 had 1-3 positive regional nodes and 8 had >or=4 positive regional nodes. Univariate analysis revealed that both the location (p<0.0001) and the number (p<0.0001) of positive nodes were significant prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis revealed that the number of positive nodes was an independent prognostic factor (p=0.007), while the location failed to remain as an independent variable. The median survival time was 59 months with a 5-year survival rate of 48% in patients with 1-3 positive nodes, whereas all patients with >or=4 positive nodes died of the disease within 29 months of resection (p=0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The number, not the location, of positive regional lymph nodes independently affects long-term survival after resection in patients with ampullary carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17097846     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  16 in total

1.  Prognostic impact of perineural invasion following pancreatoduodenectomy with lymphadenectomy for ampullary carcinoma.

Authors:  Takeshi Sudo; Yoshiaki Murakami; Kenichiro Uemura; Yasuo Hayashidani; Yasushi Hashimoto; Hiroki Ohge; Fumio Shimamoto; Taijiro Sueda
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Lymph node retrieval in pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens: does educating the pathologist matter?

Authors:  D Rohan Jeyarajah; Amit Khithani; Veeraiah Siripurapu; Elizabeth Liu; Ashley Thomas; A Joe Saad
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Substaging Nodal Status in Ampullary Carcinomas has Significant Prognostic Value: Proposed Revised Staging Based on an Analysis of 313 Well-Characterized Cases.

Authors:  Serdar Balci; Olca Basturk; Burcu Saka; Pelin Bagci; Lauren M Postlewait; Takuma Tajiri; Kee-Taek Jang; Nobuyuki Ohike; Grace E Kim; Alyssa Krasinskas; Hyejeong Choi; Juan M Sarmiento; David A Kooby; Bassel F El-Rayes; Jessica H Knight; Michael Goodman; Gizem Akkas; Michelle D Reid; Shishir K Maithel; Volkan Adsay
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Long-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Periampullary Carcinoma.

Authors:  Bhanu Jayanand Sunil; Ramakrishnan A Seshadri; S Gouthaman; Rama Ranganathan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2017-03

5.  The Role of Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes in Predicting the Survival after Resection for Ampullary Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Cihan Agalar; Anıl Aysal; Tarkan Unek; Tufan Egeli; Mucahit Ozbilgin; Nesrin Akturk; Huseyin Salih Semiz; Tugba Unek; Mesut Akarsu; Müjde Soyturk; Hulya Ellidokuz; Ozgul Sagol; Ibrahim Astarcioglu
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.201

6.  Assessment of the nodal status in ampullary carcinoma: the number of positive lymph nodes versus the lymph node ratio.

Authors:  Jun Sakata; Yoshio Shirai; Toshifumi Wakai; Yoichi Ajioka; Kouhei Akazawa; Katsuyoshi Hatakeyama
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Is para-aortic lymph node metastasis a contraindication for radical resection in biliary carcinoma?

Authors:  Yoshiaki Murakami; Kenichiro Uemura; Takeshi Sudo; Yasushi Hashimoto; Akira Nakashima; Naru Kondo; Ryutaro Sakabe; Hironori Kobayashi; Taijiro Sueda
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Nodal sampling in pancreaticoduodenectomy: does it change our management?

Authors:  Roozbeh Rassadi; Paul R Tarnasky; Jeffrey D Linder; A Joe Saad; D Rohan Jeyarajah
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Bone and brain metastases from ampullary adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ioannis A Voutsadakis; Stergios Doumas; Konstantinos Tsapakidis; Maria Papagianni; Christos N Papandreou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Preoperative cholangitis independently increases in-hospital mortality after combined major hepatic and bile duct resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jun Sakata; Yoshio Shirai; Yoshiaki Tsuchiya; Toshifumi Wakai; Tatsuya Nomura; Katsuyoshi Hatakeyama
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.