Literature DB >> 17097173

Do religious nonprofit and for-profit organizations respond differently to financial incentives? The hospice industry.

Richard C Lindrooth1, Burton A Weisbrod.   

Abstract

We study how for-profit and religious nonprofit hospices respond to an exogenous Medicare reimbursement incentive that encourages maximization of patient length of stay. Hospices have the incentive to selectively admit patients with longer expected lengths of stay, and admit patients sooner after a hospital discharge. We find that for-profit hospices are significantly less likely to admit patients with shorter, less profitable, expected lengths of stay. We do not find any difference in the timing of admission by ownership. Incentives for efficiency could be strengthened by a Medicare pricing system that replaced the current flat per diem payment with one that reflected the high costs at the beginning and end of hospice stay and the lower costs in between.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17097173     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  20 in total

1.  The debate in hospice care.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Geographic access to hospice in the United States.

Authors:  Melissa D A Carlson; Elizabeth H Bradley; Qingling Du; R Sean Morrison
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Association of hospice agency profit status with patient diagnosis, location of care, and length of stay.

Authors:  Melissa W Wachterman; Edward R Marcantonio; Roger B Davis; Ellen P McCarthy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Caring for grieving family members: results from a national hospice survey.

Authors:  Colleen L Barry; Melissa D A Carlson; Jennifer W Thompson; Mark Schlesinger; Ruth McCorkle; Stanislav V Kasl; Elizabeth H Bradley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling.

Authors:  Joseph V Terza; Anirban Basu; Paul J Rathouz
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  National hospice survey results: for-profit status, community engagement, and service.

Authors:  Melissa D Aldridge; Mark Schlesinger; Colleen L Barry; R Sean Morrison; Ruth McCorkle; Rosemary Hürzeler; Elizabeth H Bradley
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Analysing repeated hospital readmissions using data mining techniques.

Authors:  Ofir Ben-Assuli; Rema Padman
Journal:  Health Syst (Basingstoke)       Date:  2018-11-09

8.  Analysing repeated hospital readmissions using data mining techniques.

Authors:  Ofir Ben-Assuli; Rema Padman
Journal:  Health Syst (Basingstoke)       Date:  2017-11-07

Review 9.  Linking Quality and Spending to Measure Value for People with Serious Illness.

Authors:  Andrew M Ryan; Phillip E Rodgers
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.947

10.  Effect of Ownership on Hospice Service Use: 2005-2011.

Authors:  David G Stevenson; David C Grabowski; Nancy L Keating; Haiden A Huskamp
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 5.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.