BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the prognostic value of circumferential resection margin (CRM) in rectal cancer patients who underwent curative resection with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS: We studied 504 patients who underwent total mesorectal excision with adjuvant CRT for rectal cancer between 1997 and 2001. The patients were divided into two groups: a negative CRM group (CRM > 1 mm) and a positive CRM group (CRM <or= 1 mm). The survival rates, local recurrence rates, and systemic recurrence rates were compared between groups. RESULTS: The negative CRM group had 460 patients and the positive CRM group had 44 patients. The 5-year local and systemic recurrence rates were 11.3 and 25.3%, respectively, in the negative CRM group and 35.2 and 60.8% in the positive CRM group, respectively. The cancer-specific 5-year survival rates for the two groups were 72.5 and 26.9% (P < .001), respectively. CRM was found to be an independent prognostic factor by multivariate analyses which were adjusted for known outcome predictors (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Oncological outcome for patients in the positive CRM group is less favorable than for those in the negative CRM group. Adjuvant CRT is not a definite treatment modality that can be used to compensate for a positive CRM following TME and adjuvant CRT in patients with TNM stage II or III rectal cancer.
BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the prognostic value of circumferential resection margin (CRM) in rectal cancerpatients who underwent curative resection with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS: We studied 504 patients who underwent total mesorectal excision with adjuvant CRT for rectal cancer between 1997 and 2001. The patients were divided into two groups: a negative CRM group (CRM > 1 mm) and a positive CRM group (CRM <or= 1 mm). The survival rates, local recurrence rates, and systemic recurrence rates were compared between groups. RESULTS: The negative CRM group had 460 patients and the positive CRM group had 44 patients. The 5-year local and systemic recurrence rates were 11.3 and 25.3%, respectively, in the negative CRM group and 35.2 and 60.8% in the positive CRM group, respectively. The cancer-specific 5-year survival rates for the two groups were 72.5 and 26.9% (P < .001), respectively. CRM was found to be an independent prognostic factor by multivariate analyses which were adjusted for known outcome predictors (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Oncological outcome for patients in the positive CRM group is less favorable than for those in the negative CRM group. Adjuvant CRT is not a definite treatment modality that can be used to compensate for a positive CRM following TME and adjuvant CRT in patients with TNM stage II or III rectal cancer.
Authors: Maria C Russell; Y Nancy You; Chung-Yuan Hu; Janice N Cormier; Barry W Feig; John M Skibber; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; Heidi Nelson; George J Chang Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Matthias Zitt; Alexander DeVries; Josef Thaler; Reinhold Kafka-Ritsch; Wolfgang Eisterer; Peter Lukas; Dietmar Öfner Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Joachim Strassburg; Theo Junginger; Trong Trinh; Olaf Püttcher; Katja Oberholzer; Richard J Heald; Paul Hermanek Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2008-07-17 Impact factor: 2.571