Literature DB >> 17094774

Results of a prospective randomised multicentre controlled trial comparing a new 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol and electrolyte solution vs. sodium phosphate solution in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy.

A Bitoun1, T Ponchon, M Barthet, B Coffin, C Dugué, M Halphen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Elective colonoscopy is used increasingly to screen at risk patients for colonic malignancy. Bowel preparation quality is a critical factor for successful screening. Preparations used include high doses of potent laxatives, e.g. sodium phosphate solution or high volume polyethylene glycol. Because of constraints and limited patient acceptability, there remains a need for a more acceptable bowel preparation with at least equivalent cleansing to existing preparations. AIM: To determine if a 2-L polyethylene glycol solution with electrolytes and ascorbic acid (polyethylene glycol + ascorbic acid) produces equivalent bowel cleansing to sodium phosphate solution, and is acceptable to patients and well tolerated.
METHODS: This was a single blind, parallel group, equivalence study comparing polyethylene glycol + ascorbic acid with sodium phosphate solution in 352 patients undergoing elective colonoscopy. A blinded, independent expert scored a video recording of each colonoscopy. Patients completed a questionnaire reporting acceptability of the bowel preparation process.
RESULTS: Clinically successful bowel preparation was reported in 72.5% of cases prepared using polyethylene glycol + ascorbic acid and in 63.9% of cases prepared using sodium phosphate solution (treatment difference +8.6%, 95% confidence interval -2.3%, +19.4%). The new solution was well accepted and better tolerated than sodium phosphate solution.
CONCLUSIONS: The new 2-L solution of polyethylene glycol + ascorbic acid was at least as efficacious as sodium phosphate solution with comparable efficacy and a better tolerability profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17094774     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03167.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0269-2813            Impact factor:   8.171


  28 in total

1.  Polyethylene glycol vs. sodium phosphate for bowel preparation: a treatment arm meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ravi Juluri; George Eckert; Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Comparing the Real-World Effectiveness of Competing Colonoscopy Preparations: Results of a Prospective Trial.

Authors:  Phillip Gu; Daniel Lew; Sun Jung Oh; Aarshi Vipani; Jeffrey Ko; Kevin Hsu; Ebrahim Mirakhor; Varun Pattisapu; Tia Bullen; Garth Fuller; Brennan M R Spiegel; Christopher V Almario
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Split-dose menthol-enhanced PEG vs PEG-ascorbic acid for colonoscopy preparation.

Authors:  Ala I Sharara; Ali H Harb; Fayez S Sarkis; Jean M Chalhoub; Rami Badreddine; Fadi H Mourad; Mahmoud Othman; Omar Masri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Low-volume plus ascorbic acid vs high-volume plus simethicone bowel preparation before colonoscopy.

Authors:  Stefano Pontone; Rita Angelini; Monica Standoli; Gregorio Patrizi; Franco Culasso; Paolo Pontone; Adriano Redler
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  A population-based case-crossover study of polyethylene glycol use and acute renal failure risk in the elderly.

Authors:  Nam-Kyong Choi; Yoosoo Chang; Sun-Young Jung; Yu-Kyong Choi; Joongyub Lee; Jin-Ho Lee; Ju-Young Kim; Byung-Joo Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  A validated bowel-preparation tolerability questionnaire and assessment of three commonly used bowel-cleansing agents.

Authors:  I C Lawrance; R P Willert; K Murray
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Factors influencing quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Ronald V Romero; Sanjiv Mahadeva
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-02-16

8.  Randomized controlled trial comparing Moviprep® and Phosphoral® as bowel cleansing agents in patients undergoing colonoscopy.

Authors:  S Haas; L M Andersen; T Sommer
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Rescue bowel preparation: same day 2 L polyethylene glycol addition, not superior to bisacodyl addition 7 days later.

Authors:  Jong Wook Kim; Jeung Hye Han; Sun-Jin Boo; Ock Bae Ko; Soo-Kyung Park; Sang Hyoung Park; Dong-Hoon Yang; Kee Wook Jung; Kyung-Jo Kim; Byong Duk Ye; Seung-Jae Myung; Suk-Kyun Yang; Jin-Ho Kim; Jeong-Sik Byeon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: prospective assessment of patient experience and preference in comparison to optical colonoscopy with cathartic bowel preparation.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Jensch; Shandra Bipat; Jan Peringa; Ayso H de Vries; Anneke Heutinck; Evelien Dekker; Lubbertus C Baak; Alexander D Montauban van Swijndregt; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.