Literature DB >> 17094140

Evaluation of the Texas Birth Defects Registry: an active surveillance system.

Eric Miller1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evaluations of surveillance systems are necessary to determine if the goals of the system are being met, how efficiently the surveillance is being implemented, and if resources are being used appropriately. An evaluation of the Texas Birth Defects Registry was conducted to assess the overall quality of data collection and to examine variations across regions of the state.
METHODS: The registry was evaluated by using published guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems; the evaluation included staff interviews, process observation, and secondary data analysis.
RESULTS: The registry monitors >370,000 births/year through active surveillance, with considerable disparities in workload across regions of the state. Because of the geographic size and substantial population of Texas, data collection is complex. However, the estimated sensitivity of the system appears sufficient, and rates for selected defects are highly comparable with other U.S. active birth-defect surveillance systems. Registry staff continually monitor the quality of data collection and provide additional training. Amid unstable funding, the registry staff have demonstrated optimal foresight and flexibility to adapt and continue quality data collection. Timeliness needs to be improved and more consistent quality assurance is needed across regions of the state. Retaining staff and increasing visibility are essential to providing more stability.
CONCLUSIONS: Active surveillance for birth defects is labor-intensive but provides invaluable data for its stakeholders. The Texas Birth Defects Registry has proven to be a quality surveillance system and a beneficial resource for Texas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17094140     DOI: 10.1002/bdra.20331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol        ISSN: 1542-0752


  10 in total

1.  Original Findings and Updated Meta-Analysis for the Association Between Maternal Diabetes and Risk for Congenital Heart Disease Phenotypes.

Authors:  Thanh T Hoang; Lisa K Marengo; Laura E Mitchell; Mark A Canfield; A J Agopian
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Mortality by mode of delivery among infants with spina bifida in Texas.

Authors:  Renata H Benjamin; Adriana Lopez; Laura E Mitchell; KuoJen Tsao; Anthony Johnson; Peter H Langlois; Michael D Swartz; A J Agopian
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Mode of delivery and mortality among neonates with gastroschisis: A population-based cohort in Texas.

Authors:  Adriana Lopez; Renata H Benjamin; Janhavi R Raut; Anushuya Ramakrishnan; Laura E Mitchell; Kuojen Tsao; Anthony Johnson; Peter H Langlois; Michael D Swartz; A J Agopian
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.980

4.  Co-occurring defect analysis: A platform for analyzing birth defect co-occurrence in registries.

Authors:  Renata H Benjamin; Xiao Yu; Maria Luisa Navarro Sanchez; Han Chen; Laura E Mitchell; Peter H Langlois; Mark A Canfield; Michael D Swartz; Angela E Scheuerle; Daryl A Scott; Hope Northrup; Christian P Schaaf; Joseph W Ray; Scott D McLean; Philip J Lupo; A J Agopian
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Maternal occupational physical activity and risk for orofacial clefts.

Authors:  A J Agopian; Jihye Kim; Peter H Langlois; Laura Lee; Lawrence W Whitehead; Elaine Symanski; Michele L Herdt; George L Delclos
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 2.214

6.  Causes of neonatal and postneonatal death among infants with birth defects in Texas.

Authors:  Renata H Benjamin; Jason L Salemi; Mark A Canfield; Wendy N Nembhard; Cecilia Ganduglia Cazaban; KuoJen Tsao; Anthony Johnson; A J Agopian
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 2.661

7.  Patterns of congenital anomalies among individuals with trisomy 13 in Texas.

Authors:  Diego Diaz; Renata H Benjamin; Maria Luisa Navarro Sanchez; Laura E Mitchell; Peter H Langlois; Mark A Canfield; Han Chen; Angela E Scheuerle; Christian P Schaaf; Daryl A Scott; Hope Northrup; Joseph W Ray; Scott D McLean; Michael D Swartz; Katherine L Ludorf; Philip J Lupo; A J Agopian
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.578

8.  Estimated Maternal Pesticide Exposure from Drinking Water and Heart Defects in Offspring.

Authors:  Jihye Kim; Michael D Swartz; Peter H Langlois; Paul A Romitti; Peter Weyer; Laura E Mitchell; Thomas J Luben; Anushuya Ramakrishnan; Sadia Malik; Philip J Lupo; Marcia L Feldkamp; Robert E Meyer; Jennifer J Winston; Jennita Reefhuis; Sarah J Blossom; Erin Bell; A J Agopian
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Prevalence and Clustering of Congenital Heart Defects Among Boys With Hypospadias.

Authors:  Melissa A Richard; Jenil Patel; Renata H Benjamin; Emine Bircan; Stephen J Canon; Lisa K Marengo; Mark A Canfield; A J Agopian; Philip J Lupo; Wendy N Nembhard
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-07-01

10.  Birth defect co-occurrence patterns in the Texas Birth Defects Registry.

Authors:  Philip J Lupo; A J Agopian; Renata H Benjamin; Angela E Scheuerle; Daryl A Scott; Maria Luisa Navarro Sanchez; Peter H Langlois; Mark A Canfield; Hope Northrup; Christian P Schaaf; Joseph W Ray; Scott D McLean; Han Chen; Michael D Swartz
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.953

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.