Literature DB >> 17093495

Timely anaphase onset requires a novel spindle and kinetochore complex comprising Ska1 and Ska2.

Anja Hanisch1, Herman H W Silljé, Erich A Nigg.   

Abstract

Chromosome segregation during mitosis requires chromosomes to undergo bipolar attachment on spindle microtubules (MTs) and subsequent silencing of the spindle checkpoint. Here, we describe the identification and characterisation of a novel spindle and kinetochore (KT)-associated complex that is required for timely anaphase onset. The complex comprises at least two proteins, termed Ska1 (Spindle and KT Associated 1) and Ska2. Ska1 associates with KTs following MT attachment during prometaphase. Ska1 and Ska2 interact with each other and Ska1 is required for Ska2 stability in vivo. Depletion of either Ska1 or Ska2 by small interfering RNA results in the loss of both proteins from the KT. The absence of Ska proteins does not disrupt overall KT structure, but KT fibres show an increased cold-sensitivity. Most strikingly, Ska-depleted cells undergo a prolonged checkpoint-dependent delay in a metaphase-like state. This delay is characterised by the recruitment of Mad2 protein to a few KTs and the occasional loss of individual chromosomes from the metaphase plate. These data suggest that the Ska1/2 complex plays a critical role in the maintenance of the metaphase plate and/or spindle checkpoint silencing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17093495      PMCID: PMC1679759          DOI: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  35 in total

Review 1.  Centromeres and kinetochores: from epigenetics to mitotic checkpoint signaling.

Authors:  Don W Cleveland; Yinghui Mao; Kevin F Sullivan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-02-21       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Captivating capture: how microtubules attach to kinetochores.

Authors:  Sue Biggins; Claire E Walczak
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  BUBR1 phosphorylation is regulated during mitotic checkpoint activation.

Authors:  W Li; Z Lan; H Wu; S Wu; J Meadows; J Chen; V Zhu; W Dai
Journal:  Cell Growth Differ       Date:  1999-11

Review 4.  The dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface.

Authors:  Helder Maiato; Jennifer DeLuca; E D Salmon; William C Earnshaw
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  The structure of the cold-stable kinetochore fiber in metaphase PtK1 cells.

Authors:  C L Rieder
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Mitotic regulation of the human anaphase-promoting complex by phosphorylation.

Authors:  Claudine Kraft; Franz Herzog; Christian Gieffers; Karl Mechtler; Anja Hagting; Jonathon Pines; Jan-Michael Peters
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  The RanGAP1-RanBP2 complex is essential for microtubule-kinetochore interactions in vivo.

Authors:  Jomon Joseph; Song-Tao Liu; Sandra A Jablonski; Tim J Yen; Mary Dasso
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 8.  Structure, function, and regulation of budding yeast kinetochores.

Authors:  Andrew D McAinsh; Jessica D Tytell; Peter K Sorger
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 13.827

9.  Kinetochore localization and microtubule interaction of the human spindle checkpoint kinase Mps1.

Authors:  Volker M Stucke; Christoph Baumann; Erich A Nigg
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2004-07-03       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  hNuf2 inhibition blocks stable kinetochore-microtubule attachment and induces mitotic cell death in HeLa cells.

Authors:  Jennifer G DeLuca; Ben Moree; Jennifer M Hickey; John V Kilmartin; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2002-11-18       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  119 in total

Review 1.  The Renaissance or the cuckoo clock.

Authors:  Jonathon Pines; Iain Hagan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Monitoring the fidelity of mitotic chromosome segregation by the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  P Silva; J Barbosa; A V Nascimento; J Faria; R Reis; H Bousbaa
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 3.  Connecting up and clearing out: how kinetochore attachment silences the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Geert J P L Kops; Jagesh V Shah
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 4.  Regulatory mechanisms of kinetochore-microtubule interaction in mitosis.

Authors:  Kozo Tanaka
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 5.  Tubulin depolymerization may be an ancient biological motor.

Authors:  J Richard McIntosh; Vladimir Volkov; Fazly I Ataullakhanov; Ekaterina L Grishchuk
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 6.  Reconstituting the kinetochore–microtubule interface: what, why, and how.

Authors:  Bungo Akiyoshi; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 7.  Kinetochore-microtubule interactions: the means to the end.

Authors:  Tomoyuki U Tanaka; Arshad Desai
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 8.  Differentiating the roles of microtubule-associated proteins at meiotic kinetochores during chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Yasutaka Kakui; Masamitsu Sato
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 9.  Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly checkpoint signalling at the kinetochore.

Authors:  Emily A Foley; Tarun M Kapoor
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 10.  Microtubule-based force generation.

Authors:  Ian A Kent; Tanmay P Lele
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2016-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.