Literature DB >> 17092794

Macrolide resistance.

B Weisblum1.   

Abstract

The macrolides have evolved through four chemical generations since erythromycin became available for clinical use in 1952. The first generation, the 14-membered ring macrolide erythromycin, induced resistance and was replaced by the second generation 16-membered ring macrolides which did not. The inability to induce came at the price of mutation, in the pathogenic target strain, to constitutive expression of resistance. A third generation of macrolides improved the acid-stability, and therefore the pharmacokinetics of erythromycin, extending the clinical use of macrolides to Helicobacter pylori and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Improved pharmacokinetics resulted in the selection of intrinsically resistant mutant strains with rRNA structural alterations. Expression of resistance in these strains was unexpected, explainable by low rRNA gene copy number which made resistance dominant. A fourth generation of macrolides, the 14-membered ring ketolides are the most recent development. Members of this generation are reported to be effective against inducibly resistant strains, and ketolide resistant strains have not yet been reported. In this review we discuss details of the ways in which bacteria have become resistant to the first three generations of macrolides, both with respect to their biochemistry, and the genetic mechanisms by which their expression is regulated.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 17092794     DOI: 10.1016/s1368-7646(98)80212-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Resist Updat        ISSN: 1368-7646            Impact factor:   18.500


  21 in total

Review 1.  Nomenclature for macrolide and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance determinants.

Authors:  M C Roberts; J Sutcliffe; P Courvalin; L B Jensen; J Rood; H Seppala
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Macrolide resistance conferred by base substitutions in 23S rRNA.

Authors:  B Vester; S Douthwaite
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  New erm Gene in Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates.

Authors:  Mayumi Matsuoka; Matsuhisa Inoue; Yoshinori Nakajima; Yoshihiro Endo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Molecular detection of antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  A C Fluit; M R Visser; F J Schmitz
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  In vitro subminimum inhibitory concentrations of macrolide antibiotics induce macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma pneumoniae.

Authors:  G Ou; Y Liu; Y Tang; X You; Y Zeng; J Xiao; L Chen; M Yu; M Wang; C Zhu
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 0.471

6.  Combinations of macrolide resistance determinants in field isolates of Mannheimia haemolytica and Pasteurella multocida.

Authors:  Benoit Desmolaize; Simon Rose; Cornelia Wilhelm; Ralf Warrass; Stephen Douthwaite
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  A Novel erm(44) Gene Variant from a Human Staphylococcus saprophyticus Isolate Confers Resistance to Macrolides and Lincosamides but Not Streptogramins.

Authors:  Christian Strauss; Yanmin Hu; Anthony Coates; Vincent Perreten
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Two new point mutations at A2062 associated with resistance to 16-membered macrolide antibiotics in mutant strains of Mycoplasma hominis.

Authors:  P M Furneri; G Rappazzo; M P Musumarra; P Di Pietro; L S Catania; L S Roccasalva
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  The ketolides: a critical review.

Authors:  George G Zhanel; Michael Walters; Ayman Noreddin; Lavern M Vercaigne; Aleksandra Wierzbowski; John M Embil; Alfred S Gin; Stephen Douthwaite; Daryl J Hoban
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Evaluation of the automated Vitek 2 system for detection of various mechanisms of macrolide and lincosamide resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Lorenzo Filippin; Sandrine Roisin; Claire Nonhoff; Stien Vandendriessche; Amélie Heinrichs; Olivier Denis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.