Literature DB >> 17091560

Procedural misconceptions and informed consent: insights from empirical research on the clinical trials industry.

Jill A Fisher1.   

Abstract

This paper provides a simultaneously reflexive and analytical framework to think about obstacles to truly informed consent in social science and biomedical research. To do so, it argues that informed consent often goes awry due to procedural misconceptions built into the research context. The concept of procedural misconception is introduced to describe how individuals respond to what is familiar in research settings and overlook what is different. In the context of biomedical research, procedural misconceptions can be seen to function as root causes of therapeutic misconceptions.

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17091560      PMCID: PMC2952303          DOI: 10.1353/ken.2006.0018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J        ISSN: 1054-6863


  11 in total

1.  Justice for the professional guinea pig.

Authors:  T Lemmens; C Elliott
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.229

2.  Payments to research participants: the importance of context.

Authors:  R Dresser
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  "There is no evidence to suggest...": changing the way we judge information for disclosure in the informed consent process.

Authors:  Leslie Cannold
Journal:  Hypatia       Date:  1997

4.  Informing study participants of research results: an ethical imperative.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; Eric Kodish; Charles Weijer
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2003 May-Jun

5.  Misunderstanding in clinical research: distinguishing therapeutic misconception, therapeutic misestimation, and therapeutic optimism.

Authors:  Sam Horng; Christine Grady
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb

6.  Reading and teaching social medicine. [Review of: Henderson GE; King NMP; Strauss RP; Estroff SE; Churchill LR. The social medicine reader. Duke University Press, 1997].

Authors:  D J Hufford; D Barnard; M Green; A H Hawkins
Journal:  Med Humanit Rev       Date:  1998

7.  What must research subjects be told regarding the results of completed randomized trials?

Authors:  Maurie Markman
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2004 May-Jun

8.  Co-ordinating 'ethical' clinical trials: the role of research coordinators in the contract research industry.

Authors:  Jill A Fisher
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2006-09

9.  Autonomy, discourse, and power: a postmodern reflection on principlism and bioethics.

Authors:  P McGrath
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  1998-08

10.  Moral reasoning and the review of research involving human subjects.

Authors:  L Eckenwiler
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  2001-03
View more
  10 in total

1.  "Ready-to-Recruit" or "Ready-to-Consent" Populations?: Informed Consent and the Limits of Subject Autonomy.

Authors:  Jill A Fisher
Journal:  Qual Inq       Date:  2007-09

2.  Coming Soon to a Physician Near You: Medical Neoliberalism and Pharmaceutical Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Jill A Fisher
Journal:  Harvard Health Policy Rev       Date:  2007

3.  Informed Consent: An Ethical Issue in Conducting Research with Male Partner Violent Offenders.

Authors:  Cory A Crane; Samuel W Hawes; Dolores Mandel; Caroline J Easton
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2013

4.  Benefits of "Observer Effects": Lessons from the Field.

Authors:  Torin Monahan; Jill A Fisher
Journal:  Qual Res       Date:  2010-06-01

5.  Ethics in Psychiatric Research: A Review of 25 Years of NIH-funded Empirical Research Projects.

Authors:  James Dubois; Holly Bante; Whitney B Hadley
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2011-12-06

6.  Practicing research ethics: private-sector physicians & pharmaceutical clinical trials.

Authors:  Jill A Fisher
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Institutional mistrust in the organization of pharmaceutical clinical trials.

Authors:  Jill A Fisher
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2008-07-17

8.  Formative Evaluation of Participant Experience With Mobile eConsent in the App-Mediated Parkinson mPower Study: A Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Megan Doerr; Amy Maguire Truong; Brian M Bot; John Wilbanks; Christine Suver; Lara M Mangravite
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.773

9.  Planning for translational research in genomics.

Authors:  Naomi Hawkins; Jantina de Vries; Paula Boddington; Jane Kaye; Catherine Heeney
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 11.117

10.  Picking and Choosing Among Phase I Trials : A Qualitative Examination of How Healthy Volunteers Understand Study Risks.

Authors:  Jill A Fisher; Torin Monahan; Rebecca L Walker
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 1.352

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.