Literature DB >> 12166445

Moral reasoning and the review of research involving human subjects.

L Eckenwiler1.   

Abstract

The model of moral reasoning used in Institutional Review Board review fails to uphold ethical ideals for research participants for it does not adequately acknowledge the particular context of research or of subjects, including their gender, their socioeconomic status, and the communities in which they lead their lives. The ethical review of research needs to take seriously the particularities of the research context as well as the situations of potential participants. A variety of conclusions are drawn for changes to the system for ethical review. Most significant is a call for effective consultation with the various communities affected by research and greater reliance on subject representatives. Also proposed is national review for selected research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12166445     DOI: 10.1353/ken.2001.0003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J        ISSN: 1054-6863


  8 in total

1.  Ethical oversight of public health research: can rules and IRBs make a difference in developing countries?

Authors:  Leslie London
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Towards a balanced approach to identifying conflicts of interest faced by institutional review boards.

Authors:  Sharon Kaur; Sujata Balan
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2015-10

3.  Co-ordinating 'ethical' clinical trials: the role of research coordinators in the contract research industry.

Authors:  Jill A Fisher
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2006-09

Review 4.  Partnership as an ethical model for medical research in developing countries: the example of the "implementation trial".

Authors:  D W Dowdy
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Procedural misconceptions and informed consent: insights from empirical research on the clinical trials industry.

Authors:  Jill A Fisher
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  2006-09

6.  Human subjects protections in community-engaged research: a research ethics framework.

Authors:  Lainie Friedman Ross; Allan Loup; Robert M Nelson; Jeffrey R Botkin; Rhonda Kost; George R Smith; Sarah Gehlert
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  The battering of informed consent.

Authors:  M Kottow
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 8.  Confronting diversity in the production of clinical evidence goes beyond merely including under-represented groups in clinical trials.

Authors:  Karien Stronks; Nicolien F Wieringa; Anita Hardon
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 2.279

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.