Literature DB >> 17089240

Right ventricular apex versus right ventricular outflow tract pacing: prospective, randomised, long-term clinical and echocardiographic evaluation.

Ewa Lewicka-Nowak1, Alicja Dabrowska-Kugacka, Sebastian Tybura, Elzbieta Krzymińska-Stasiuk, Rajmund Wilczek, Justyna Staniewicz, Grazyna Swiatecka, Grzegorz Raczek.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In patients treated with permanent pacing, the electrode is typically placed in the right ventricular apex (RVA). Published data indicate that such electrode placement leads to an unfavourable ventricular depolarization pattern, while right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) pacing seems to be more physiological. AIM: To compare long-term effects of RVOT versus RVA pacing on clinical status, left ventricular (LV) function, and the degree of atrioventricular valve regurgitation.
METHODS: Patients with indications for permanent pacing, admitted to hospital between 1996 and 1997, were randomised to receive RVA or RVOT pacing. In 2004 during a final control visit in 27 patients clinical status, echocardiographic parameters and QRS complex duration as well as NT-proBNP level were measured. Analysed parameters were compared between groups and in the case of data available during the perioperative period also their evolution in time was assessed.
RESULTS: Out of 27 patients 14 were randomised to the RVA group and 13 to the RVOT group. No significant differences between groups were observed before the procedure with respect to age, gender, comorbidities or echocardiographic parameters. Mean duration of pacing did not differ significantly between the groups (89+/-9 months in RVA group vs 93+/-6 months in RVOT group, NS). In the RVA group significant LV ejection fraction decrease was observed (from 56+/-11% to 47+/-8%, p <0.05); in the RVOT group LV ejection fraction did not change (54+/-7% and 53+/-9%; NS). Progression of tricuspid valve regurgitation was also observed in the RVA group but not in the RVOT group. During the final visit NT-proBNP level was significantly higher in the RVA group: 1034+/-852 pg/ml vs 429+/-430 pg/ml (p <0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with normal LV function permanent RVA pacing leads to LV systolic and diastolic function deterioration. RVOT pacing can reduce the unfavourable effect and can slow down cardiac remodelling caused by permanent RV pacing. Clinical and echocardiographic benefits observed in the RVOT group after 7 years of pacing are reflected by lower NT-proBNP levels in this group of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17089240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kardiol Pol        ISSN: 0022-9032            Impact factor:   3.108


  8 in total

Review 1.  [His-bundle stimulation and alternative RV stimulation sites].

Authors:  G Fröhlig; M Kindermann
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-03

2.  Midrange ejection fraction as a risk factor for deterioration of cardiofunction after permanent pacemaker implantation.

Authors:  Hua He; XiaoDong Li; BingBing Ke; Zhuo Chen; FuSheng Han; YuJie Zeng
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Right ventricular septal pacing: has it come of age?

Authors:  Johnson Francis; B Jayesh; M Ashishkumar; Ali Faizal; Harry Mond
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2010-02-01

4.  The acute and chronic effects of different right ventricular site pacing on left ventricular mechanical synchrony as assessed by phase analysis of SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Hongxiang Zhang; Xiaofeng Hou; Yao Wang; Sheliang Xue; Kejiang Cao; Ji Chen; Jiangang Zou
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Influence of atrioventricular optimization on hemodynamic parameters and quality of life in patients with dual chamber pacemaker with ventricular lead in right ventricular outflow tract.

Authors:  Artur Klimczak; Adam S Budzikowski; Marcin Rosiak; Marzenna Zielińska; Bożena Urbanek; Karol Bartczak; Michał Chudzik; Jerzy K Wranicz
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 1.468

6.  Development of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation in right ventricular apex versus right ventricular outflow tract pacing.

Authors:  Sevil Hemayat; Akbar Shafiee; Saeed Oraii; Farideh Roshanali; Farshid Alaedini; Amirhossein Sami Aldoboni
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Analysis of Dyssynchrony and Ventricular Function in Right Univentricular Stimulation at Different Positions.

Authors:  Ana Paula Susin Osório; Stefan Warpechowski; Antonio Lessa Gaudie Ley; Marcelo Haertel Miglioranza; Laura Lessa Gaudie Ley; Eduardo Dytz Almeida; Roberto Tofani Sant'anna; Tiago Luiz Luz Leiria
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec

8.  Radial left ventricular dyssynchrony by speckle tracking in apical versus non apical right ventricular pacing- evidence of dyssynchrony on medium term follow up.

Authors:  Dinesh Choudhary; Amit Kumar Chaurasia; S Mahesh Kumar; Ajeet Arulkumar; Anees Thajudeen; Narayanan Namboodiri; G Sanjay; S P Abhilash; V K Ajitkumar; Tharakan Ja
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Thorac Res       Date:  2016-03-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.