Literature DB >> 17086363

The benefit of 64-MDCT prior to invasive coronary angiography in symptomatic post-CABG patients.

R Dikkers1, T P Willems, R A Tio, R L Anthonio, F Zijlstra, M Oudkerk.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT in symptomatic patients after CABG and to explore the advantages of the 64-MDCT results on the CAG procedure.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: From December 2004 until August 2005, 34 post-CABG patients (29 men, mean age 63.5 +/- 8.5 years) with 69 coronary artery bypass grafts were scanned on a 64-MDCT (Somatom Sensation 64, Siemens AG, Forchheim, Germany) prior to CAG. Angiograms and 64-MDCT images were evaluated for the existence of occlusions or significant stenosis (>or=50% lumen reduction) in bypass grafts and native coronary arteries.
RESULTS: 64-MDCT had a sensitivity, a specificity, and a diagnostic accuracy of 100% for occlusion detection. For stenosis detection, sensitivity was 100%, specificity 98.7% and diagnostic accuracy 98.7%. For detecting significant stenosis in native coronary arteries, 64-MDCT had a sensitivity of 80.0%, specificity of 90.8%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 87.1%. Seventeen patients (50.0%) did not need invasive treatment, 14 patients (41.2%) underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and 3 patients (8.8%) underwent surgery. Treatment advice based on 64-MDCT was correct in 88.2% of patients and when 64-MDCT results would have been known 58.8% of diagnostic CAG procedures could have been prevented.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, 64-MDCT has a high diagnostic accuracy in detecting bypass graft stenosis and occlusions, and 64-MDCT based treatment advice was correct in 88.2% of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17086363     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-006-9170-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.316


  28 in total

1.  Midterm results of complete arterial revascularization in more than 1,000 patients using an internal thoracic artery/radial artery T graft.

Authors:  H B Barner; T M Sundt; M Bailey; Y Zang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  The comparison of the graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting using coronary angiography and multi-slice computed tomography.

Authors:  Kyung-Jong Yoo; Donghoon Choi; Byoung Wook Choi; Sang-Hyun Lim; Byung-Chul Chang
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft with retrospectively ECG-gated four-row multi-detector spiral computed tomography.

Authors:  Riccardo Marano; Maria Luigia Storto; Nicola Maddestra; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Postoperative angiographic evaluation of gastroepiploic artery grafts: technical considerations and short-term patency.

Authors:  T Isshiki; T Yamaguchi; M Nakamura; F Saeki; Y Itaoka; T Nagahara; Y Furuta; Y Ikari; Y Wanibuchi; H Suma
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1990-12

5.  Computed tomography assessment of coronary bypass grafts: ready to replace conventional angiography?

Authors:  Nico R Mollet; Filippo Cademartiri
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine.

Authors:  D W Cockcroft; M H Gault
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.847

7.  First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system.

Authors:  Thomas G Flohr; Cynthia H McCollough; Herbert Bruder; Martin Petersilka; Klaus Gruber; Christoph Süss; Michael Grasruck; Karl Stierstorfer; Bernhard Krauss; Rainer Raupach; Andrew N Primak; Axel Küttner; Stefan Achenbach; Christoph Becker; Andreas Kopp; Bernd M Ohnesorge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-12-10       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Alexander W Leber; Andreas Knez; Franz von Ziegler; Alexander Becker; Konstantin Nikolaou; Stephan Paul; Bernd Wintersperger; Maximilian Reiser; Christoph R Becker; Gerhard Steinbeck; Peter Boekstegers
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  Multisection CT evaluation of the reoperative cardiac surgery patient.

Authors:  Robert C Gilkeson; Alan H Markowitz; Leslie Ciancibello
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.333

10.  Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates.

Authors:  Jörg Hausleiter; Tanja Meyer; Martin Hadamitzky; Ester Huber; Maria Zankl; Stefan Martinoff; Adnan Kastrati; Albert Schömig
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Coronary artery bypass grafts and MDCT imaging: what to know and what to look for.

Authors:  Riccardo Marano; Carlo Liguori; Pierluigi Rinaldi; Maria Luigia Storto; Marco Angelo Politi; Giancarlo Savino; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Korean guidelines for the appropriate use of cardiac CT.

Authors:  Young Jin Kim; Hwan Seok Yong; Sung Mok Kim; Jeong A Kim; Dong Hyun Yang; Yoo Jin Hong
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Clinical utility of early postoperative cardiac multidetector computed tomography after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Doo Kyoung Kang; Sang Hyun Lim; Jin Sun Park; Joo Sung Sun; Taeyang Ha; Tae Hee Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.