Literature DB >> 17085170

Beneficial effect of microsurgical varicocelectomy is superior for men with bilateral versus unilateral repair.

Jamie Libman1, Keith Jarvi, Kirk Lo, Armand Zini.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Varicocele represents the most common correctable cause of male infertility, and most reports indicate that varicocelectomy has a beneficial effect on male fertility and pregnancy outcome. Little is known about the differential effect of bilateral, compared to unilateral varicocelectomy, on male fertility potential.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 369 consecutive varicocelectomies were performed for male factor infertility between July 1996 and July 2002. The outcomes measured include postoperative changes in semen parameters, pregnancy rates (assisted and unassisted) and use of assisted reproductive technology (intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection).
RESULTS: There were 157 men who underwent bilateral and 212 who underwent unilateral left varicocelectomy. Both groups had comparable male and female ages, and baseline semen parameters. Semen parameters improved significantly after surgery in the bilateral and unilateral groups. Moreover, the improvement in percent motility was significantly greater in the bilateral compared to the unilateral group (8.0% +/- 1.7% compared to 4.4% +/- 1.5% improvement, respectively, p <0.01). In addition, the spontaneous pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the bilateral compared to the unilateral group (49% vs 36%, respectively, p <0.05). Assisted reproductive technology was comparable in the unilateral and bilateral groups (64% vs 51%, respectively, p >0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that bilateral varicocelectomy (for clinically palpable bilateral varicoceles) is associated with a significantly greater improvement in sperm quality (motility) and male fertility potential than unilateral varicocelectomy. The greater improvement in semen parameters and pregnancy outcome associated with bilateral varicocelectomy support the concept of a detrimental dose-effect of varicocele on male fertility potential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17085170     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  11 in total

Review 1.  The great debate: varicocele treatment and impact on fertility.

Authors:  Matthew A Will; Jason Swain; Mikkel Fode; Jens Sonksen; Gregory M Christman; Dana Ohl
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Minilaparoscopic varicocelectomy with preservation of testicular artery and lymphatic vessels by using intracorporeal knot-tying technique: five-year experience.

Authors:  Shiu-Dong Chung; Chia-Chang Wu; Victor Chia-Hsiang Lin; Chen-Hsun Ho; Stephen Shei Dei Yang; Yao-Chou Tsai
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Predictors for spontaneous pregnancy after microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jian-Wei Zhang; Quan-Quan Xu; You-Lin Kuang; Yan Wang; Feng Xu; Yu-Dong Tian
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Varicocele and semen quality: a retrospective case-control study of 4230 patients from a single centre.

Authors:  F Pallotti; D Paoli; T Carlini; A R Vestri; G Martino; A Lenzi; F Lombardo
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 5.  Surgical treatment of male infertility in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection - new insights.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Ricardo Miyaoka; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  A critical appraisal on the role of varicocele in male infertility.

Authors:  Ricardo Miyaoka; Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2011-11-28

7.  Proteomic signatures of infertile men with clinical varicocele and their validation studies reveal mitochondrial dysfunction leading to infertility.

Authors:  Ashok Agarwal; Rakesh Sharma; Luna Samanta; Damayanthi Durairajanayagam; Edmund Sabanegh
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 8.  Prognostic factors for a favorable outcome after varicocele repair in adolescents and adults.

Authors:  Mary K Samplaski; Keith A Jarvi
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 9.  Comparison of surgical effect and postoperative patient experience between laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zheng Zhang; Shu-Juan Zheng; Wen Yu; You-Feng Han; Hai Chen; Yun Chen; Yu-Tian Dai
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 10.  Varicocele management for infertility and pain: A systematic review.

Authors:  Scott D Lundy; Edmund S Sabanegh
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2017-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.