Literature DB >> 17084553

Permanent prostate implant using high activity seeds and inverse planning with fast simulated annealing algorithm: A 12-year Canadian experience.

André-Guy Martin1, Jean Roy, Luc Beaulieu, Jean Pouliot, François Harel, Eric Vigneault.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report outcomes and toxicity of the first Canadian permanent prostate implant program. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 396 consecutive patients (Gleason < or =6, initial prostate specific antigen (PSA) < or =10 and stage T1-T2a disease) were implanted between June 1994 and December 2001. The median follow-up is of 60 months (maximum, 136 months). All patients were planned with fast-simulated annealing inverse planning algorithm with high activity seeds ([gt] 0.76 U). Acute and late toxicity is reported for the first 213 patients using a modified RTOG toxicity scale. The Kaplan-Meier biochemical failure-free survival (bFFS) is reported according to the ASTRO and Houston definitions.
RESULTS: The bFFS at 60 months was of 88.5% (90.5%) according to the ASTRO (Houston) definition and, of 91.4% (94.6%) in the low risk group (initial PSA < or =10 and Gleason < or =6 and Stage < or =T2a). Risk factors statistically associated with bFFS were: initial PSA >10, a Gleason score of 7-8, and stage T2b-T3. The mean D90 was of 151 +/- 36.1 Gy. The mean V100 was of 85.4 +/- 8.5% with a mean V150 of 60.1 +/- 12.3%. Overall, the implants were well tolerated. In the first 6 months, 31.5% of the patients were free of genitourinary symptoms (GUs), 12.7% had Grade 3 GUs; 91.6% were free of gastrointestinal symptoms (GIs). After 6 months, 54.0% were GUs free, 1.4% had Grade 3 GUs; 95.8% were GIs free.
CONCLUSION: The inverse planning with fast simulated annealing and high activity seeds gives a 5-year bFFS, which is comparable with the best published series with a low toxicity profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17084553     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.08.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  11 in total

1.  The best method for dose escalation: Prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Gerard Morton
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Canadian prostate brachytherapy in 2012.

Authors:  Mira Keyes; Juanita Crook; W James Morris; Gerard Morton; Tom Pickles; Nawaid Usmani; Eric Vigneault
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Treatment options for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mira Keyes; Juanita Crook; Gerard Morton; Eric Vigneault; Nawaid Usmani; W James Morris
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  American Brachytherapy Society Task Group Report: Use of androgen deprivation therapy with prostate brachytherapy-A systematic literature review.

Authors:  M Keyes; G Merrick; S J Frank; P Grimm; M J Zelefsky
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Brachytherapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Georgios Koukourakis; Nikolaos Kelekis; Vassilios Armonis; Vassilios Kouloulias
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2009-09-01

6.  Practical considerations in the selection of seed strength for prostate implants.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; Catherine L Beaufort; Jeremy L Millar
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Risk factors for rectal bleeding associated with I-125 brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kosaku Harada; Hitoshi Ishikawa; Yoshitaka Saito; Soken Nakamoto; Hidemasa Kawamura; Masaru Wakatsuki; Toru Etsunaga; Yutaka Takezawa; Mikio Kobayashi; Takashi Nakano
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Pre-plan parameters predict post-implant D90 ≥ 140 Gy for (125)I permanent prostate implants.

Authors:  Jes Alexander; Vivian Weinberg; Alexander R Gottschalk; I-Chow Joe Hsu; Katsuto Shinohara; Mack Roach
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2014-06-03

9.  COMP report: CPQR technical quality control guidelines for low-dose-rate permanent seed brachytherapy.

Authors:  Luc Beaulieu; Dee-Ann Radford; J Eduardo Villarreal-Barajas
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Analysis of outcomes after non-contour-based dose painting of dominant intra-epithelial lesion in intra-operative low-dose rate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Kevin Martell; Soumyajit Roy; Tyler Meyer; Jordan Stosky; Will Jiang; Kundan Thind; Michael Roumeliotis; John Bosch; Steve Angyalfi; Harvey Quon; Siraj Husain
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-06-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.