Literature DB >> 17084319

Small rural hospitals and high-risk operations: how would regionalization affect surgical volume and hospital revenue?

André R Chappel1, Randall S Zuckerman, Samuel R G Finlayson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because higher hospital procedure volume is associated with better outcomes for many high-risk procedures, regionalization to higher-volume hospitals has been proposed as a way to improve quality of surgical care. The potential impact of such policies on small rural hospital volume and revenue is unknown. STUDY
DESIGN: We identified all hospitalizations in small rural hospitals (less than 50 beds) in New York State from 1998 to 2001 that included an ICD-9 procedure code for 1 of 9 procedures for which there is a documented volume-outcomes association: abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, aortic-valve replacement, carotid endarterectomy, colectomy, coronary artery bypass, cystectomy, esophagectomy, pancreatectomy, or pulmonary resection. Revenue from these procedures was estimated using gross charges and payor-specific reimbursement rates. We then compared these estimates with total hospital inpatient revenue for each rural hospital.
RESULTS: We identified 14 small rural hospitals where at least one of the nine procedures was performed. All included hospitalizations for colectomy. Aortic aneurysm repairs, cystectomies, and pancreatectomies were performed in three hospitals; carotid endarterectomy in two; and esophagectomy in one. In no hospitals were cardiac procedures or pulmonary resections performed. Estimated average contribution to hospital net revenue for all 9 procedures was approximately 2%, nearly all attributable to colectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: If all aortic aneurysm repairs, major cardiothoracic procedures, carotid endarterectomies, cystectomies, and pancreatectomies in New York State were regionalized to higher-volume hospitals, no small rural hospitals would experience substantial impact in terms of rural hospital procedure volume and revenue. Even regionalization of colectomy would have a small impact on inpatient volume and revenue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17084319     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  7 in total

1.  Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery.

Authors:  Jonathan F Finks; Nicholas H Osborne; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  SAGES 2007 rural surgery panel.

Authors:  Thomas A Broughan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Trends in Hospital Volume and Failure to Rescue for Pancreatic Surgery.

Authors:  Neda Amini; Gaya Spolverato; Yuhree Kim; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Routine diversion of patients with STEMI to high-volume PCI centres: modelling the financial impact on referral hospitals.

Authors:  Elizabeth Barnett Pathak; Meg M Comins; Colin J Forsyth; Joel A Strom
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2015-06-29

5.  Rural-Urban Differences in Esophagectomy for Cancer.

Authors:  Joseph G Brungardt; Omar A Almoghrabi; Carolyn B Moore; G John Chen; Alykhan S Nagji
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2021-12-02

6.  Impact of Competition Versus Centralisation of Hospital Care on Process Quality: A Multilevel Analysis of Breast Cancer Surgery in France.

Authors:  Zeynep Or; Emeline Rococco; Mariama Touré; Julia Bonastre
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2022-04-01

7.  Higher hospitalization and mortality rates among SARS-CoV-2-infected persons in rural America.

Authors:  Alfred Jerrod Anzalone; Ronald Horswell; Brian M Hendricks; San Chu; William B Hillegass; William H Beasley; Jeremy R Harper; Wesley Kimble; Clifford J Rosen; Lucio Miele; James C McClay; Susan L Santangelo; Sally L Hodder
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 5.667

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.