Literature DB >> 17084295

Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in elite throwing athletes.

Jason Lee Koh1, Michael F Schafer, Greg Keuter, Jason E Hsu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries may result in disabling valgus instability in throwing athletes. We evaluated the docking technique for UCL reconstruction and describe a modification to the technique.
METHODS: UCL surgery was indicated in 20 high-level baseball players (13 professional and 7 collegiate) based on medial elbow pain preventing effective throwing, clinically apparent medial elbow laxity, and magnetic resonance arthrogram consistent with UCL injury. The mean age was 21.7 years (range, 17.9 to 25.3 years). One patient had previous UCL reconstruction. One had previous arthroscopic elbow debridement. The mean time between injury and treatment was 73 days. Reconstruction was performed via a muscle-splitting approach and the docking technique with palmaris or gracilis graft. For the initial 12 patients, a 2-strand construct was used; however, during the study period, we developed and began using a 3-strand construct with a double anterior bundle and a single posterior bundle, which was used in the next 8 patients. The ulnar nerve was not routinely transposed unless there were preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms (1 patient). Two patients had osteophyte debridement. One had removal of a loose body.
RESULTS: Patients were followed up for a mean of 41.9 months (range, 6.4 to 67.1 months). One player was lost to follow-up and could not be identified on a professional roster. Of the remaining 19 patients, 18 returned to their previous level of participation or higher. Two were occasional pitchers who did not wish to return to pitching but continued to play other positions. They were clinically and functionally asymptomatic. The mean time to return to play was 13.1 months (range, 6.3 to 21.3 months). By use of the Timmerman-Andrews 100-point subjective scoring system, the mean preoperative score was 77.0 (range, 65 to 80) and the mean postoperative score was 98.2 (range, 85 to 100). By use of the Conway-Jobe scoring system, the outcome was rated as excellent in 17 patients and good in 2. One patient underwent subsequent ulnar nerve transposition and returned to the previous level of professional play.
CONCLUSIONS: UCL reconstruction with the docking technique is a reproducible and safe operation that can reliably return athletes to a high level of participation with limited adverse effects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17084295     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.07.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  24 in total

1.  Does posteromedial chondromalacia reduce rate of return to play after ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction?

Authors:  Daryl C Osbahr; Joshua S Dines; Andrew J Rosenbaum; Joseph T Nguyen; David W Altchek
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Pitcher's elbow: medial elbow pain in the overhead-throwing athlete.

Authors:  William H Rossy; Luke S Oh
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

Review 3.  Biomechanical testing of the reconstructed ulnar collateral ligament: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  B M Saltzman; B J Erickson; J M Frank; J D Harris; G P Nicholson; B R Bach; N N Verma; A A Romeo
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-09-14

Review 4.  [Chronic ligamentous instability of the elbow].

Authors:  M Hackl; T Leschinger; L P Müller; K Wegmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  State of the Union on Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in 2020: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Cort D Lawton; Joseph D Lamplot; Joshua I Wright-Chisem; Evan W James; Christopher L Camp; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-06

Review 6.  The History and Evolution of Elbow Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: from Tommy John to 2020.

Authors:  Andrew R Jensen; Matthew D LaPrade; Travis W Turner; Joshua S Dines; Christopher L Camp
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-06

7.  Efficacy, usability and tolerability of a dynamic elbow orthosis after collateral ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  G Merolla; P Bianchi; G Porcellini
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2013-10-25

8.  Elbow Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament chronic isolated insufficiency: anatomical M-UCL reconstruction technique and clinical experience in a mid-term follow-up.

Authors:  M Bartoli; L A Pederzini; G Severini; F Serafini; M Prandini
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2018-10-20

9.  Elbow medial collateral ligament injuries.

Authors:  Ra'kerry K Rahman; William N Levine; Christopher S Ahmad
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2008-12

10.  Trends in Patient, Physician, and Public Perception of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Using Social Media Analytics.

Authors:  Jonathan S Yu; James B Carr; Jacob Thomas; Julianna Kostas; Zhaorui Wang; Tyler Khilnani; Katie Liu; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.