Literature DB >> 17083282

Perception of surface slant from oriented textures.

Jeffrey A Saunders1, Benjamin T Backus.   

Abstract

When a surface covered with a regular texture is viewed in perspective, the projected texture provides a number of cues to 3D surface orientation. For oriented textures, one cue is perspective convergence: symmetry lines that are parallel along the surface project to lines that vary systematically in orientation. We investigated the contribution of perspective convergence to perception of 3D slant and tested whether slant from convergence depends on oriented spectral components. Subjects judged the sign of slant about a vertical axis of rotation. Textures were composed of filled circles in three spatial arrangements: a hex grid with symmetry lines at 0 and +/-60 deg relative to the tilt direction (aligned condition), a hex grid with symmetry lines at 90 and +/-30 deg (perpendicular condition), and random arrangements with similar average spacing (isotropic condition). The two hex grid textures differed in the amount of spectral energy present in the tilt direction (horizontal) but were otherwise closely matched. Slant discrimination thresholds for monocular stimuli were higher for isotropic textures than for either of the two hex grid textures and were higher for the perpendicular texture than for the aligned texture. In a second experiment, we measured the weight given to texture relative to binocular slant information for cue conflict stimuli (+/-5 deg). Weights were found to agree with individual subjects' monocular thresholds, in accordance with optimal estimation theory. We conclude that the visual system uses perspective convergence to perceive slant and that effective use of convergence requires the presence of spectral components aligned with the tilt direction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17083282     DOI: 10.1167/6.9.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  9 in total

1.  Representation of 3-D surface orientation by velocity and disparity gradient cues in area MT.

Authors:  Takahisa M Sanada; Jerry D Nguyenkim; Gregory C Deangelis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Perceptual Adaptation to Continuous Versus Intermittent Exposure to Spatial Distortions.

Authors:  Iona R McLean; Tyler S Manning; Emily A Cooper
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 4.925

3.  Release from cross-orientation suppression facilitates 3D shape perception.

Authors:  Andrea Li; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Early dynamics of stereoscopic surface slant perception.

Authors:  Baptiste Caziot; Benjamin T Backus; Esther Lin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Dominance of orientation over frequency in the perception of 3-D slant and shape.

Authors:  Danny M Tam; Ji Shin; Andrea Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The duration aftereffect does not reflect adaptation to perceived duration.

Authors:  Jim Maarseveen; Chris L E Paffen; Frans A J Verstraten; Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The experience of stereoblindness does not improve use of texture for slant perception.

Authors:  Pin Yang; Jeffrey A Saunders; Zhongting Chen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.004

8.  Attention Gates the Selective Encoding of Duration.

Authors:  Jim Maarseveen; Hinze Hogendoorn; Frans A J Verstraten; Chris L E Paffen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Multiple texture cues are integrated for perception of 3D slant from texture.

Authors:  Zhongting Chen; Jeffrey A Saunders
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.