Literature DB >> 17083097

Management of refractory urinary urge incontinence following urogynecological surgery with sacral neuromodulation.

Jonathan S Starkman1, Christopher E Wolter, Harriette M Scarpero, Douglas F Milam, Roger R Dmochowski.   

Abstract

AIMS: We sought to explore our patient outcomes utilizing sacral neuromodulation in the management of refractory urinary urge incontinence following urogynecological surgical procedures.
METHODS: A total of 25 women with urinary urge incontinence following urogynecological surgery were selected for SNS therapy and retrospectively analyzed. All patients completed a comprehensive urological evaluation. Clinical data was recorded to determine outcomes and identify parameters that would be predictive of response to neuromodulation. Outcomes were determined via subjective patient questionnaire and graded as follows: significant response (> or =80% improvement), moderate response (> or =50% and <80% improvement), and poor response (<50% response).
RESULTS: Nineteen patients had a previous pubovaginal sling (10 with concomitant pelvic prolapse repair), 3 a previous retropubic suspension, and 3 a transperitoneal vesicovaginal fistula repair. Urethrolysis was performed in 4 patients to alleviate bladder outlet obstruction prior to sacral neuromodulation. Mean patient age was 59.8 years and length of follow-up was 7.2 months. Twenty-two women (88%) had the IPG placed during a Stage 2 procedure. Twenty patients maintained at least a 50% improvement in clinical symptoms at last follow-up and 6 patients were continent. Overall, the number of pads/day improved from 4.2 to 1.1 (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in response to neuromodulation based upon age, duration of symptoms, type of surgery, or urodynamic parameters.
CONCLUSION: Sacral neuromodulation appears to be an effective therapy in patients with refractory urge incontinence following urogynecological surgery. Larger prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to assess the durability of this therapeutic modality. Copyright 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17083097     DOI: 10.1002/nau.20360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  9 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of clinical studies of electrical stimulation for treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Authors:  Ash K Monga; Michael R Tracey; Jeyakumar Subbaroyan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Current opinion: complications and troubleshooting of sacral neuromodulation.

Authors:  Paul Pettit
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Low current electrical stimulation upregulates cytokine expression in the anal sphincter.

Authors:  Levilester Salcedo; Lei Lian; Hai-Hong Jiang; Nikolai Sopko; Marc Penn; Margot Damaser; Massarat Zutshi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Refractory overactive bladder after urethrolysis for bladder outlet obstruction: management with sacral neuromodulation.

Authors:  Jonathan S Starkman; John W Duffy; Christopher E Wolter; Melissa R Kaufman; Harriette M Scarpero; Roger R Dmochowski
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-08-02

Review 5.  [Second-line therapy of idiopathic detrusor overactivity. Sacral neuromodulation and botulinum toxin A].

Authors:  B Amend; D Castro-Diaz; E Chartier-Kastler; D De Ridder; K Everaert; M Spinelli; P van Kereebroeck; K-D Sievert
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  Management of Postoperative Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) After Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) Repair.

Authors:  Annie Chen; Brian McIntyre; Elise J B De
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 7.  Sacral neuromodulation in overactive bladder: a review and current perspectives.

Authors:  Troy Sukhu; Michael J Kennelly; Raj Kurpad
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2016-10-26

Review 8.  Current and future techniques of neuromodulation for bladder dysfunction.

Authors:  Neil D Sherman; Cindy L Amundsen
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 9.  Neuromodulation - a therapeutic option for refractory overactive bladder. A recent literature review.

Authors:  Jacek K Szymański; Aneta Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak; Kornelia Zaręba; Grzegorz Jakiel
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 1.195

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.