Literature DB >> 17082926

[What kind of stone prevention for whom? Risk-adjusted metaphylaxis following urinary stone disease].

M Straub1.   

Abstract

Approximately 5% of the German population suffers from urinary stone disease, but only 25% of these urolithiasis patients are at risk of recurrent stone disease or a severe metabolic disorder. It is important that patients at high risk are picked up early, so that appropriate therapy and measures designed to prevent secondary stone disease can be implemented. Risk classification is easily achieved by combining stone analysis with a basic diagnostic program. Patients at low risk need no further diagnostic evaluation or treatment, so that it is enough to recommend general metaphylaxis in these cases. In contrast, patients at high risk require additional specific aftercare and should be evaluated with the aid of a comprehensive diagnostic program from the start to allow precise definition of the metabolic targets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17082926     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-006-1224-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  8 in total

1.  [Urinary calculi. 1: Epidemiology, laboratory diagnosis, genetics and infections].

Authors:  A Hesse
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Study on the prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany comparing the years 1979 vs. 2000.

Authors:  A Hesse; E Brändle; D Wilbert; K-U Köhrmann; P Alken
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 3.  Renal stone analysis: why and how?

Authors:  G P Kasidas; C T Samuell; T B Weir
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.057

4.  Quality control in urinary stone analysis: results of 44 ring trials (1980-2001).

Authors:  Albrecht Hesse; Rolf Kruse; Wolf-Jochen Geilenkeuser; Matthias Schmidt
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Comparison of methods and guaranteeing quality of analyses of urinary calculi--5th international ring test.

Authors:  G Rebentisch; W Berg
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 6.  Rational evaluation of urinary stone disease.

Authors:  Albrecht Hesse; Michael Straub
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2006-02-01

7.  Course of calcium stone disease without treatment. What can we expect?

Authors:  W L Strohmaier
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 8.  Diagnosis and metaphylaxis of stone disease. Consensus concept of the National Working Committee on Stone Disease for the upcoming German Urolithiasis Guideline.

Authors:  M Straub; W L Strohmaier; W Berg; B Beck; B Hoppe; N Laube; S Lahme; M Schmidt; A Hesse; K U Koehrmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2005-11-29       Impact factor: 4.226

  8 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Urolithiasis--an interdisciplinary diagnostic, therapeutic and secondary preventive challenge.

Authors:  Christian Fisang; Ralf Anding; Stefan C Müller; Stefan Latz; Norbert Laube
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  [Qualitative and quantitative analysis of urolithiasis with the Rietveld method (x-ray diffraction)].

Authors:  H Euler; H P Bastian; P J Bastian; G Lümmen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  [Urolithiasis in children--rational diagnosis, therapy, and metaphylaxis].

Authors:  D Fahlenkamp; B Noack; S Lebentrau; H Belz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.