Literature DB >> 15843235

Quality control in urinary stone analysis: results of 44 ring trials (1980-2001).

Albrecht Hesse1, Rolf Kruse, Wolf-Jochen Geilenkeuser, Matthias Schmidt.   

Abstract

Urinary stone analysis is the most important diagnostic step after stone removal from the body. The methods employed for these analyses are based on diverse analytical principles. Chemical methods are used for detecting individual ions. Infrared spectroscopy is used for examining molecular structures, and X-ray diffraction for determination of the crystalline structure of a substance. Since 1980, a twice-yearly ring trials quality control survey has been on offer to examine the quality of urinary stone analyses. A summary of the results of 44 ring trials (1980-2001) has been compiled for individual pure substances and binary (two-component) mixtures. On average, 100 laboratories have participated in these ring trials. Initially, over 80% of the participants carried out their analyses using chemical methods. In 2001, this figure decreased to a mere 13%. In contrast, a progressive increase in the use of infrared spectroscopy was observed, up to 79% of all participants employed this method. X-Ray diffraction was only employed in a small number of specialised laboratories (5-9%). The chemical methods produced a very high proportion of errors (6.5-94%) with both the pure substances and binary mixtures, whereas high error rates for infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction were confined to individual substances only. Due to the poor results in the ring trials, the majority of laboratories stopped using chemical analysis, which is now considered to be obsolete. Regarding mixtures, error rates of over 10% also occurred with infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. Ring trials are indispensable for the quality management of urinary stone analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15843235     DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2005.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  31 in total

1.  Analysis of mixed stones is prone to error: a study with US laboratories using micro CT for verification of sample content.

Authors:  Amy E Krambeck; James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; James C Williams
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-10-22

2.  Inaccurate reporting of mineral composition by commercial stone analysis laboratories: implications for infection and metabolic stones.

Authors:  Amy E Krambeck; Naseem F Khan; Molly E Jackson; James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; James C Williams
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  [Urinary calculi. Metabolism and diagnosis].

Authors:  R E Hautmann; M Straub
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  [Modern general metaphylaxis of stone disease. New risks, new evidence, new recommendations].

Authors:  R Siener; A Hesse
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Comparison of super-mini versus mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of upper urinary tract stones in children: a single centre experience.

Authors:  Abulizi Simayi; Peng Lei; Talaiti Tayier; Aihemaiti Aimaier; Zhang Xiao'an; Yalikun Alimu
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  [The goal must be freedom from stone and freedom from recurrence! Postscript to the main topic].

Authors:  A Hesse
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy is a reliable method for urinary stone analysis.

Authors:  Nazım Mutlu; Seyfettin Çiftçi; Turgay Gülecen; Belgin Genç Öztoprak; Arif Demir
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-03

Review 8.  [S2k guidelines on diagnostics, therapy and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis (AWMF 043/025) : Compendium].

Authors:  T Knoll; T Bach; U Humke; A Neisius; R Stein; M Schönthaler; G Wendt-Nordahl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Interpreting the results of chemical stone analysis in the era of modern stone analysis techniques.

Authors:  Ron Gilad; James C Williams; Kalba D Usman; Ronen Holland; Shay Golan; Ruth Tor; David Lifshitz
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.902

10.  X-ray diffraction analysis of urinary calculi: need for heat treatment.

Authors:  Vladimir B Nalbandyan
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2008-09-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.