Literature DB >> 17082884

[Neuromuscular blockades. Agents, monitoring and antagonism].

J-U Schreiber1, T Fuchs-Buder.   

Abstract

Currently, the main aims of using neuromuscular blocking agents during general anaesthesia are the improvement of surgical and intubation conditions. Neuromuscular blocking agents themselves are neither analgesic nor anaesthetic. All agents interact with the acetylcholinergic receptor at the neuromuscular junction and induce a blockade either through a continuous activation imitating the effect of acetylcholine or through a competitive antagonism against acetylcholine. Succinylcholine is the only depolarizing muscle relaxant that is in clinical use. Non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockers may be grouped by their chemical structure into benzylisoquinolines or aminosteroids, and cover the complete range from short and intermediate, to long acting agents. Possible adverse drug reactions to the single agents are also related to their mechanism of action. Moreover, pharmacokinetic properties and effects such as histamine liberation could play an important role when choosing a myorelaxant. The depth of a neuromuscular block and recovery from paralysis can be monitored using qualitative and quantitative techniques. Therefore, the monitoring of neuromuscular recovery plays an important role in the prevention of postoperative complications due to residual paralysis. In case of residual paralysis, cholinesterase inhibitors are suitable for reversal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17082884     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-006-1104-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  13 in total

1.  An alternate method for estimating the dose-response relationships of neuromuscular blocking drugs.

Authors:  A F Kopman; M M Klewicka; G G Neuman
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Laryngeal morbidity and quality of tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas Mencke; Mathias Echternach; Stefan Kleinschmidt; Philip Lux; Volker Barth; Peter K Plinkert; Thomas Fuchs-Buder
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Can acceleromyography detect low levels of residual paralysis? A probability approach to detect a mechanomyographic train-of-four ratio of 0.9.

Authors:  Florent Capron; Francois Alla; Claire Hottier; Claude Meistelman; Thomas Fuchs-Buder
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Magnesium sulphate enhances residual neuromuscular block induced by vecuronium.

Authors:  T Fuchs-Buder; E Tassonyi
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Single acceleromyographic train-of-four, 100-Hertz tetanus or double-burst stimulation: which test performs better to detect residual paralysis?

Authors:  Amir Samet; Florent Capron; François Alla; Claude Meistelman; Thomas Fuchs-Buder
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 6.  Newer neuromuscular blocking agents: how do they compare with established agents?

Authors:  H J Sparr; T M Beaufort; T Fuchs-Buder
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Remifentanil and propofol without muscle relaxants or with different doses of rocuronium for tracheal intubation in outpatient anaesthesia.

Authors:  N Schlaich; F Mertzlufft; S Soltész; T Fuchs-Buder
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.105

8.  Intubation conditions after rocuronium or succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction with alfentanil and propofol in the emergency patient.

Authors:  P B Larsen; E G Hansen; L S Jacobsen; J Wiis; P Holst; H Rottensten; R Siddiqui; H Wittrup; A M Sørensen; S Persson; J Engbaek
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Prevention of succinylcholine-induced fasciculation and myalgia: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Jan-Uwe Schreiber; Christopher Lysakowski; Thomas Fuchs-Buder; Martin R Tramèr
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Anaesthetic practice and postoperative pulmonary complications.

Authors:  T Pedersen; J Viby-Mogensen; C Ringsted
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.105

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Precurarization with a non-depolarizing muscle relaxant].

Authors:  S Bugger
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  [General anesthesia for ambulatory surgery : Clinical pharmacological considerations on the practical approach].

Authors:  S Löser; A Herminghaus; T Hüppe; W Wilhelm
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.041

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.