Literature DB >> 17080416

Analysis of outcomes of single polypropylene mesh in total pelvic floor reconstruction.

Kaytan V Amrute1, Evan R Eisenberg, Ardeshir R Rastinehad, Leslie Kushner, Gopal H Badlani.   

Abstract

AIMS: A 2.5-year outcome analysis was performed on patients who underwent transvaginal repair of total pelvic organ prolapse with single polypropylene mesh. A description of the repair technique using a tension-free 4-point fixation is also reviewed.
METHODS: After proper vaginal dissection, a specially fashioned "H" shaped polypropylene mesh is positioned and fixed at 4-points. With a single piece of mesh, the anterior arms provide mid-urethral and bladder neck support, the mid-portion of the mesh corrects anterior compartment defects, and the posterior arms aid in vaginal vault suspension. Initially, bone anchors were utilized for anterior fixation, but currently a tension-free method is used. A retrospective analysis using chart review was performed on 96 patients who underwent this procedure from January 2000 to June 2005. Additional information was gathered by a telephone survey using a questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test, with Sigma Stat(R).
RESULTS: Seventy-six patients (79%) were available with a mean follow-up time of 30.7 +/- 1.7 months and mean age of 69.3 +/- 11.3. Among those with follow-up, 36 patients (47.4%) underwent concurrent hysterectomies. Recurrence of prolapse was reported by four patients (5.2%). Sixty-eight patients (89%) were completely dry or almost dry, defined as an occasional leak. For those with preoperative incontinence (n = 36), average pad use per day decreased significantly from 2.1 +/- 0.4 to 0.8 +/- 0.2 (P < 0.005) postoperatively. Twelve patients (15.7%) reported of de novo urgency. Six patients required reoperation including excision of vaginal mesh erosion (2), uretholysis for obstruction (1), removal of palpable vaginal suture (1), and recurrent SUI (2). Among the 21 patients who are sexually active, 19 denied any dyspareunia (90.4%). Patient satisfaction was high, as the mean value was 7.9 +/- 0.3 on a scale of 1 (least satisfied) to 10 (most satisfied).
CONCLUSIONS: Transvaginal repair of complete pelvic prolapse using polypropylene mesh is a safe and efficacious option, with minimal recurrence of prolapse and SUI. While two patients had vaginal erosions, no urethral or bladder erosions occurred. Patient satisfaction was overall favorable. Copyright 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17080416     DOI: 10.1002/nau.20362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  18 in total

Review 1.  Severe cystocele: optimizing results.

Authors:  Jennifer T Anger; Shlomo Raz; Larissa V Rodríguez
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Abdominal sacral colpopexy: surgical pearls and outcomes.

Authors:  Anthony J Woodruff; Christopher C Roth; J Christian Winters
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Risk factors for mesh erosion 3 months following vaginal reconstructive surgery using commercial kits vs. fashioned mesh-augmented vaginal repairs.

Authors:  Peter S Finamore; Karolynn T Echols; Krystal Hunter; Howard B Goldstein; Adam S Holzberg; Babak Vakili
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Cystocele repair by vaginal route: comparison of three different surgical techniques of mesh placement.

Authors:  Pascal Mourtialon; Vincent Letouzey; Georges Eglin; Renaud de Tayrac
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Lower exposure rates of partially absorbable mesh compared to nonabsorbable mesh for cystocele treatment: 3-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  J Farthmann; D Watermann; A Niesel; C Fünfgeld; A Kraus; F Lenz; H J Augenstein; E Graf; B Gabriel
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  [Vaginal pelvic repair. Always with mesh or not?].

Authors:  H Loertzer; R H Ringert; A Fechner; P Thelen; C Kümmel; A Strauss
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Use of synthetic mesh in pelvic reconstructive surgery: a survey of attitudes and practice patterns of urogynecologists.

Authors:  Samantha J Pulliam; Tanaz R Ferzandi; Lekha S Hota; Eman A Elkadry; Peter L Rosenblatt
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-04-25

8.  Symptom resolution and sexual function after anterior vaginal wall repair with or without polypropylene mesh.

Authors:  Kari Nieminen; Reijo Hiltunen; Eila Heiskanen; Teuvo Takala; Kirsti Niemi; Mauri Merikari; Pentti K Heinonen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-08-21

Review 9.  Apical prolapse.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 10.  Anterior vaginal compartment surgery.

Authors:  Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.