Literature DB >> 17078471

Detecting bacterial contamination in platelet products.

Elizabeth L Palavecino1, Roslyn A Yomtovian, Michael R Jacobs.   

Abstract

Bacterial contamination of platelets is an important cause of transfusion-associated morbidity and mortality. It is currently the most frequent infectious complication of transfusion therapy, with between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 3,000 platelet units being bacterially contaminated at time of transfusion. Several factors have contributed to the persistence of this problem including lack of sensitive detection methods, lack of recognition of the frequency of the problem, inadequate recognition of septic reactions by clinicians treating patients receiving platelet transfusions, differences in transfusion reactions between bacterial species and bacterial inocula transfused, and differing methodologies and time of testing for detection of bacteria in platelet units. There are also important correlations between the receipt of bacterially contaminated platelet units and the development of transfusion reactions and bacteremia. In the last few years the recognition of the importance of platelet bacterial contamination prompted the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and the American Association of Blood Banks (AABB) to set new standards requiring the screening of platelets for bacterial contamination. In the wake of these standards, an increasing number of approaches have been and are being developed to deal with this problem. The clinical sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of these detection methods vary considerably and need to be defined for routine laboratory practice. In this review, we focus on the practical aspects and feasibility of implementing FDA-cleared detection methods for identifying bacterially contaminated platelet units. We also present details of a number of methods under development for at-issue use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17078471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lab        ISSN: 1433-6510            Impact factor:   1.138


  5 in total

1.  [Conventional vs pathogen-inactivated platelet concentrates for the treatment of perioperative coagulopathy. A prospective cohort study].

Authors:  C F Weber; D Meininger; C Byhahn; E Seifried; K Zacharowski; E Adam; R Henschler; M M Müller
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  A prospective study to determine the frequency of bacterial contamination of platelets.

Authors:  Nagarekha Kulkarni
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 3.  Diagnostic methods for platelet bacteria screening: current status and developments.

Authors:  Melanie Störmer; Tanja Vollmer
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.747

4.  Bacterial screening of platelet concentrates on day 2 and 3 with flow cytometry: the optimal sampling time point?

Authors:  Tanja Vollmer; Volkmar Schottstedt; Juergen Bux; Gabriele Walther-Wenke; Cornelius Knabbe; Jens Dreier
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 3.443

5.  The Pan Genera Detection immunoassay: a novel point-of-issue method for detection of bacterial contamination in platelet concentrates.

Authors:  Tanja Vollmer; Dennis Hinse; Knut Kleesiek; Jens Dreier
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 5.948

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.