Literature DB >> 17077227

Adverse events detected by clinical surveillance on an obstetric service.

Alan J Forster1, Irene Fung, Sharon Caughey, Lawrence Oppenheimer, Cathy Beach, Kaveh G Shojania, Carl van Walraven.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Adverse events are adverse patient outcomes resulting from medical care. We performed this study to estimate the rate of adverse events and potential adverse events-errors that have a high likelihood of causing patient harm-occurring during obstetric care.
METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of an obstetric unit in a teaching hospital. We included patients admitted consecutively to the hospital. A trained observer monitored patients for 72 triggers, which were predefined occurrences deemed likely to indicate an actual or potential adverse event. When a trigger occurred, the observer captured information describing it. A five-person multidisciplinary team, including the observer, three physicians, and a hospital risk manager, judged whether the trigger represented an adverse event or potential adverse event. Adverse events were further characterized as preventable.
RESULTS: The cohort included 425 patients; 47% were in active labor. We identified 110 triggers. Nine were considered adverse events (risk 2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1-4%, rate 0.8 events per 100 patient days), and six were preventable (risk 1%, 95% CI 0-3%, rate 0.5 events per 100 patient days). The remaining triggers included 14 potential adverse events (risk 3%, 95% CI 2-5%, rate 1.3 events per 100 patient days). No adverse event resulted in permanent disability or death. Adverse events and potential adverse events were most commonly "system" problems, such as unavailable staff or operating rooms, or poor fetal outcomes, such as trauma to the newborn.
CONCLUSION: Serious adverse events occur infrequently on an obstetric service. However, important quality problems are common and should be targeted for improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17077227     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000242565.28432.7c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  14 in total

1.  Revisiting duty hour restrictions: any evidence that patients have benefited?

Authors:  Errol R Norwitz; James A Greenberg
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010

Review 2.  Improving patient safety through the systematic evaluation of patient outcomes.

Authors:  Alan J Forster; Geoff Dervin; Claude Martin; Steven Papp
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  The dimensions of nursing surveillance: a concept analysis.

Authors:  Lesly Kelly; Deborah Vincent
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  Translating staff experience into organisational improvement: the HEADS-UP stepped wedge, cluster controlled, non-randomised trial.

Authors:  Samuel Pannick; Thanos Athanasiou; Susannah J Long; Iain Beveridge; Nick Sevdalis
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Teamwork in obstetric critical care.

Authors:  Jeanne-Marie Guise; Sally Segel
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 5.237

6.  Use of an interactive, telephone-based self-management support program to identify adverse events among ambulatory diabetes patients.

Authors:  Urmimala Sarkar; Margaret A Handley; Reena Gupta; Audrey Tang; Elizabeth Murphy; Hilary K Seligman; Kaveh G Shojania; Dean Schillinger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Development of an evidence-based framework of factors contributing to patient safety incidents in hospital settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca Lawton; Rosemary R C McEachan; Sally J Giles; Reema Sirriyeh; Ian S Watt; John Wright
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 7.035

8.  Application of a trigger tool in near real time to inform quality improvement activities: a prospective study in a general medicine ward.

Authors:  Brian M Wong; Sonia Dyal; Edward E Etchells; Sandra Knowles; Lauren Gerard; Artemis Diamantouros; Rajin Mehta; Barbara Liu; G Ross Baker; Kaveh G Shojania
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 7.035

9.  A pre and post intervention study to reduce unnecessary urinary catheter use on general internal medicine wards of a large academic health science center.

Authors:  Krista R Wooller; Chantal Backman; Shipa Gupta; Alison Jennings; Delvina Hasimja-Saraqini; Alan J Forster
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  How do emergency physicians make discharge decisions?

Authors:  Lisa A Calder; Trevor Arnason; Christian Vaillancourt; Jeffrey J Perry; Ian G Stiell; Alan J Forster
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.