Literature DB >> 17076805

phyA dominates in transduction of red-light signals to rapidly responding genes at the initiation of Arabidopsis seedling de-etiolation.

James M Tepperman1, Yong-Sic Hwang, Peter H Quail.   

Abstract

Contrary to expectations based on the visible phenotypic behavior of seedlings undergoing de-etiolation in response to continuous red light (Rc), previous gene expression profiling showed that one or more of the five-membered phytochrome (phy) family of Arabidopsis, other than phyB, is predominantly responsible for transducing the Rc signals to light-responsive genes. To begin to identify which phys are involved, and to define potential primary targets of phy signaling, we have examined the genome-wide expression profiles of genes responding to Rc within 1 h (early response genes) of initial exposure of dark-grown wild-type, phyA, phyB and phyAphyB double mutant seedlings to the light signal. The data show that phyA has a quantitatively dominant role in Rc-induced expression of these early response genes, that phyB has minimal detectable regulatory activity in the presence of phyA, but assumes a quantitatively larger role in its absence, and that phyA and phyB combined are responsible for the full extent of Rc responsiveness of 96% of these genes. No evidence was obtained of a significant role for the remaining family members, phyC, phyD or phyE, in this process. In striking contrast, Rc-imposed repression of early response gene expression remains quantitatively strong in the phyAphyB double mutant, as well as the monogenic mutants, suggesting a significant role for one or more of the other three phys in this response. Examination of the established or predicted functional roles of the early response genes indicates that genes encoding transcription factors represent the largest single category, at a frequency three times their prevalence genome-wide. This dominance is particularly striking among those genes responding most robustly to the Rc signal, where >50% are classified as involved in transcriptional regulation, suggesting that these may have potentially primary regulatory roles at the interface between phy signaling and the light-responsive transcriptional network. Integration of the present data with those of a previous genome-scale transcriptional analysis of a pif3 mutant, suggests a complex network involving perception and transduction of inductive Rc signals by both phyA and phyB through both PIF3 and other undefined signaling partners to early response genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17076805     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02914.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant J        ISSN: 0960-7412            Impact factor:   6.417


  69 in total

1.  BBX32, an Arabidopsis B-Box protein, functions in light signaling by suppressing HY5-regulated gene expression and interacting with STH2/BBX21.

Authors:  Hans E Holtan; Simona Bandong; Colleen M Marion; Luc Adam; Shiv Tiwari; Yu Shen; Julin N Maloof; Don R Maszle; Masa-Aki Ohto; Sasha Preuss; Rob Meister; Marie Petracek; Peter P Repetti; T Lynne Reuber; Oliver J Ratcliffe; Rajnish Khanna
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Phytochrome-imposed oscillations in PIF3 protein abundance regulate hypocotyl growth under diurnal light/dark conditions in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Judit Soy; Pablo Leivar; Nahuel González-Schain; Maria Sentandreu; Salomé Prat; Peter H Quail; Elena Monte
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 6.417

Review 3.  Genomic basis for light control of plant development.

Authors:  Jigang Li; William Terzaghi; Xing Wang Deng
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 14.870

4.  Interaction with plant transcription factors can mediate nuclear import of phytochrome B.

Authors:  Anne Pfeiffer; Marie-Kristin Nagel; Claudia Popp; Florian Wüst; János Bindics; András Viczián; Andreas Hiltbrunner; Ferenc Nagy; Tim Kunkel; Eberhard Schäfer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Photobodies in light signaling.

Authors:  Elise K Van Buskirk; Peter V Decker; Meng Chen
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  A phytochrome-phototropin light signaling complex at the plasma membrane.

Authors:  Katharina Jaedicke; Anna Lena Lichtenthäler; Rabea Meyberg; Mathias Zeidler; Jon Hughes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Integration of light and auxin signaling.

Authors:  Karen J Halliday; Jaime F Martínez-García; Eve-Marie Josse
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 8.  Evolutionary studies illuminate the structural-functional model of plant phytochromes.

Authors:  Sarah Mathews
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  Phytochrome signaling mechanisms.

Authors:  Jigang Li; Gang Li; Haiyang Wang; Xing Wang Deng
Journal:  Arabidopsis Book       Date:  2011-08-29

10.  Phytochrome induces rapid PIF5 phosphorylation and degradation in response to red-light activation.

Authors:  Yu Shen; Rajnish Khanna; Christine M Carle; Peter H Quail
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.