Literature DB >> 17075846

Remodeling dynamics in the alveolar process in skeletally mature dogs.

Sarandeep S Huja1, Soledad A Fernandez, Kara J Hill, Yan Li.   

Abstract

Bone turnover rates can be altered by metabolic and mechanical demands. Due to the difference in the pattern of loading, we hypothesized that there are differences in bone remodeling rates between the maxillary and mandibular alveolar processes. Furthermore, in a canine model, the alveolar process of teeth that lack contact (e.g., second premolars) would have a different turnover rate than bone supporting teeth with functional contact (e.g., first molars). Six skeletally mature male dogs were given a pair of calcein labels. After sacrifice, specimens representing the anterior and posterior locations of both jaws were prepared for examination by histomorphometric methods to evaluate the bone volume/total volume (BV/TV; %), bone volume (mm2), mineral apposition rate (MAR; microm/day), and bone formation rate (BFR; %/year) in the alveolar process. There were no significant differences (P>0.05) in the BV/TV within the jaws. The bone volume within the alveolar process of the mandible was 2.8-fold greater than in the maxilla. The MAR was not significantly different between the jaws and anteroposterior locations. However, the BFR was significantly (P<0.0001) greater in the mandible than in the maxilla. The anterior location had higher (P=0.002) remodeling than the posterior location in the maxilla but not in the mandible. While there was a greater bone mass and increased remodeling in the mandible, no remodeling gradient in the coronal-apical direction was apparent in the alveolar process. Bone adaptation probably involves a complex interplay of bone turnover, mass, and architecture. Copyright (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17075846      PMCID: PMC2612758          DOI: 10.1002/ar.a.20396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol        ISSN: 1552-4884


  25 in total

1.  Differences in static cortical bone remodeling parameters in human mandible and iliac crest.

Authors:  C Verna; B Melsen; F Melsen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 2.  Targeted and nontargeted remodeling.

Authors:  D B Burr
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  Targeted and nontargeted bone remodeling: relationship to basic multicellular unit origination and progression.

Authors:  A M Parfitt
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Changes in bone remodeling rate influence the degree of mineralization of bone.

Authors:  G Boivin; P J Meunier
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.417

5.  Description of a photoelastic coating technique to describe surface strain of a dog skull loaded in vitro.

Authors:  Roy B Judge; Joseph E A Palamara; Ronald G Taylor; Helen M S Davies; John G Clement
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Functional significance of cortical bone distribution in anthropoid mandibles: an in vitro assessment of bone strain under combined loads.

Authors:  David J Daegling; Jennifer L Hotzman
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.868

7.  Age-related variations in cortical bone-remodeling measurements in male Beagles 10 to 26 months of age.

Authors:  C Anderson; K D Danylchuk
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 1.156

8.  [Quantitative analysis of the structural reconstruction processes in the dog mandible in relation to age].

Authors:  G Marotti; M De Lena
Journal:  Arch Ital Anat Embriol       Date:  1966-09

Review 9.  Experimental observation, theoretical models, and biomechanical inference in the study of mandibular form.

Authors:  D J Daegling; W L Hylander
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.868

10.  Strain in the galago facial skull.

Authors:  M J Ravosa; K R Johnson; W L Hylander
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.804

View more
  49 in total

Review 1.  The effects of bisphosphonates on jaw bone remodeling, tissue properties, and extraction healing.

Authors:  Matthew R Allen
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  RANK ligand inhibition in bone metastatic cancer and risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ): non bis in idem?

Authors:  Tim Van den Wyngaert; Kristien Wouters; Manon T Huizing; Jan B Vermorken
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Mandible matrix necrosis in beagle dogs after 3 years of daily oral bisphosphonate treatment.

Authors:  Matthew R Allen; David B Burr
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw after tooth extraction in cancer patients: a multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  T Hasegawa; S Hayashida; E Kondo; Y Takeda; H Miyamoto; Y Kawaoka; N Ueda; E Iwata; H Nakahara; M Kobayashi; S Soutome; S I Yamada; I Tojyo; Y Kojima; M Umeda; S Fujita; H Kurita; Y Shibuya; T Kirita; T Komori
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Effects of Bisphosphonate Administration on Cleft Bone Graft in a Rat Model.

Authors:  Nicole Cheng; Juyoung Park; Jeffrey Olson; Taewoo Kwon; Deborah Lee; Rachel Lim; Sandy Ha; Reuben Kim; Xinli Zhang; Kang Ting; Sotirios Tetradis; Christine Hong
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2017-01-17

6.  Influence of bisphosphonates on endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and osteogenic cells.

Authors:  C Walter; M O Klein; A Pabst; B Al-Nawas; H Duschner; T Ziebart
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Does regular zoledronic acid change the bone turnover of the jaw in men with metastatic prostate cancer: a possible clue to the pathogenesis of bisphosphonate related osteonecrosis of the jaw?

Authors:  Oliver Ristow; Carlos Gerngroß; Markus Schwaiger; Bettina Hohlweg-Majert; Melanie Ristow; Steffen Koerdt; Roswitha Schuster; Sven Otto; Christoph Pautke
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 8.  [Bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw].

Authors:  Maria-Theresa Krauth; Alexander Fügl; Reinhard Gruber
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.704

9.  Mandibular necrosis in beagle dogs treated with bisphosphonates.

Authors:  D B Burr; M R Allen
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 10.  Bisphosphonates and osteonecrosis of the jaw: moving from the bedside to the bench.

Authors:  Matthew R Allen
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 2.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.