Literature DB >> 10861831

Strain in the galago facial skull.

M J Ravosa1, K R Johnson, W L Hylander.   

Abstract

Little experimental work has been directed at understanding the distribution of stresses along the facial skull during routine masticatory behaviors. Such information is important for understanding the functional significance of the mammalian circumorbital region. In this study, bone strain was recorded along the dorsal interorbit, postorbital bar, and mandibular corpus in Otolemur garnettii and O. crassicaudatus (greater galagos) during molar chewing and biting. We determined principal-strain magnitudes and directions, compared peak shear-strain magnitudes between various regions of the face, and compared galago strain patterns with similar experimental data for anthropoids. This suite of analyses were used to test the facial torsion model (Greaves [1985] J Zool (Lond) 207:125-136; [1991] Zool J Linn Soc 101:121-129; [1995] Functional morphology in vertebrate paleontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p 99-115). A comparison of galago circumorbital and mandibular peak strains during powerful mastication indicates that circumorbital strains are very low in magnitude. This demonstrates that, as in anthropoids, the strepsirhine circumorbital region is highly overbuilt for countering routine masticatory loads. The fact that circumorbital peak-strain magnitudes are uniformly low in both primate suborders undermines any model that emphasizes the importance of masticatory stresses as a determinant of circumorbital form, function, and evolution. Preliminary data also suggest that the difference between mandibular and circumorbital strains is greater in larger-bodied primates. This pattern is interpreted to mean that sufficient cortical bone must exist in the circumorbital region to prevent structural failure due to nonmasticatory traumatic forces. During unilateral mastication, the direction of epsilon(1) at the galago dorsal interorbit indicates the presence of facial torsion combined with bending in the frontal plane. Postorbital bar principal-strain directions during mastication are oriented, on average, very close to 45 degrees relative to the skull's long axis, much as predicted by the facial torsion model. When chewing shifts from one side of the face to the other, there is a characteristic reversal or flip-flop in principal-strain directions for both the interorbit and postorbital bar. Although anthropoids also exhibit an interorbital reversal pattern, peak-strain directions for this clade are opposite those for galagos. The presence of such variation may be due to suborder differences in relative balancing-side jaw-muscle force recruitment. Most importantly, although the strain-direction data for the galago circumorbital region offer support for the occurrence of facial torsion, the low magnitude of these strains suggests that this loading pattern may not be an important determinant of circumorbital morphology. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10861831     DOI: 10.1002/1097-4687(200007)245:1<51::AID-JMOR4>3.0.CO;2-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Morphol        ISSN: 0022-2887            Impact factor:   1.804


  12 in total

1.  Biomechanics of the rostrum and the role of facial sutures.

Authors:  Katherine L Rafferty; Susan W Herring; Christopher D Marshall
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.804

2.  Masticatory loadings and cranial deformation in Macaca fascicularis: a finite element analysis sensitivity study.

Authors:  L C Fitton; J F Shi; M J Fagan; P O'Higgins
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  Combining geometric morphometrics and functional simulation: an emerging toolkit for virtual functional analyses.

Authors:  Paul O'Higgins; Samuel N Cobb; Laura C Fitton; Flora Gröning; Roger Phillips; Jia Liu; Michael J Fagan
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  In vitro bone strain distributions in a sample of primate pelves.

Authors:  Kristi L Lewton
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Bone up: craniomandibular development and hard-tissue biomineralization in neonate mice.

Authors:  Khari D Thompson; Holly E Weiss-Bilka; Elizabeth B McGough; Matthew J Ravosa
Journal:  Zoology (Jena)       Date:  2017-01-29       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  In vivo bone strain and finite element modeling of a rhesus macaque mandible during mastication.

Authors:  Olga Panagiotopoulou; José Iriarte-Diaz; Simon Wilshin; Paul C Dechow; Andrea B Taylor; Hyab Mehari Abraha; Sharifah F Aljunid; Callum F Ross
Journal:  Zoology (Jena)       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  In vivo bone strain and finite-element modeling of the craniofacial haft in catarrhine primates.

Authors:  Callum F Ross; Michael A Berthaume; Paul C Dechow; Jose Iriarte-Diaz; Laura B Porro; Brian G Richmond; Mark Spencer; David Strait
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Mastication and the postorbital ligament: dynamic strain in soft tissues.

Authors:  Susan W Herring; Katherine L Rafferty; Zi Jun Liu; Michael Lemme
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.326

9.  Remodeling dynamics in the alveolar process in skeletally mature dogs.

Authors:  Sarandeep S Huja; Soledad A Fernandez; Kara J Hill; Yan Li
Journal:  Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol       Date:  2006-12

10.  Effects of orthodontic treatment on human alveolar bone density distribution.

Authors:  Hechang Huang; Michael Richards; Tamer Bedair; Henry W Fields; J Martin Palomo; William M Johnston; Do-Gyoon Kim
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.