OBJECTIVE: Theory and some preliminary evidence suggest that contingency management may be an effective treatment strategy or adjunct to psychosocial treatment for methamphetamine use disorders. An experimentally rigorous investigation on the topic was provided by a large multisite trial conducted under the auspices of the Clinical Trials Network of the National Institute on Drug Abuse. METHOD: The authors report data on 113 participants who were diagnosed with methamphetamine abuse or dependence. They were randomly assigned to receive 12 weeks of either treatment as usual or treatment as usual plus contingency management. Urine samples were tested for illicit drugs, and breath samples were tested for alcohol. The reinforcers for drug-negative samples were plastic chips, some of which could be exchanged for prizes. The number of plastic chips drawn increased with each week of negative samples but was reset to one after a missed or positive sample. RESULTS: The participants in both groups remained in treatment for equivalent times, but those receiving contingency management in addition to usual treatment submitted significantly more negative samples, and they were abstinent for a longer period of time (5 versus 3 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that contingency management has promise as a component in treatment strategies for methamphetamine use disorder.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Theory and some preliminary evidence suggest that contingency management may be an effective treatment strategy or adjunct to psychosocial treatment for methamphetamine use disorders. An experimentally rigorous investigation on the topic was provided by a large multisite trial conducted under the auspices of the Clinical Trials Network of the National Institute on Drug Abuse. METHOD: The authors report data on 113 participants who were diagnosed with methamphetamine abuse or dependence. They were randomly assigned to receive 12 weeks of either treatment as usual or treatment as usual plus contingency management. Urine samples were tested for illicit drugs, and breath samples were tested for alcohol. The reinforcers for drug-negative samples were plastic chips, some of which could be exchanged for prizes. The number of plastic chips drawn increased with each week of negative samples but was reset to one after a missed or positive sample. RESULTS: The participants in both groups remained in treatment for equivalent times, but those receiving contingency management in addition to usual treatment submitted significantly more negative samples, and they were abstinent for a longer period of time (5 versus 3 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that contingency management has promise as a component in treatment strategies for methamphetamine use disorder.
Authors: Radha Rajasingham; Matthew J Mimiaga; Jaclyn M White; Megan M Pinkston; Rachel P Baden; Jennifer A Mitty Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2011-11-09 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Craig R Rush; William W Stoops; Joshua A Lile; Paul E A Glaser; Lon R Hays Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2010-11-12 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Richard A Rawson; Joy Chudzynski; Larissa Mooney; Rachel Gonzales; Alfonso Ang; Daniel Dickerson; Jose Penate; Bilal A Salem; Brett Dolezal; Christopher B Cooper Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Matthew J Mimiaga; Sari L Reisner; Yves-Michel Fontaine; Sean E Bland; Maura A Driscoll; Deborah Isenberg; Kevin Cranston; Margie R Skeer; Kenneth H Mayer Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2010-03-23 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Matthew J Mimiaga; Sari L Reisner; David W Pantalone; Conall O'Cleirigh; Kenneth H Mayer; Steven A Safren Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2012-10-03 Impact factor: 5.078