PURPOSE: To determine dosimetric risk factors for increased toxicity after permanent interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Quality of life questionnaires (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite) of 60 and 56 patients were analyzed after a median posttreatment time of 6 weeks (A-acute) and 16 months (L-late). The corresponding CT scans were performed 30 days after the implant. The prostate, rectal wall, and base of seminal vesicles were contoured. Prostate volume, number of seeds and needles as well as dosimetric parameters were correlated with the morbidity scores. RESULTS: For a prostate volume of 38 +/- 12 cm(3) (mean +/- standard deviation), 54 +/- 7 (125)I sources (Rapid Strands), activity of 22.6 +/- 3.0 MBq [0.61 +/- 0.08 mCi]) were implanted using 20 +/- 6 needles. Improved late urinary function scores resulted from a higher number of sources per cm(3) (> or = 1.35). A prostate D(90) < 170 Gy (A)/< 185 Gy (L) and base of seminal vesicle D(10) < 190 Gy (A and L) were associated with higher urinary function scores. Late rectal function scores were significantly higher for patients with a prostate V(200) < 50% and V(150) < 75%. Patients with a prostate volume < 40 cm(3) reached better sexual function scores (A and L). A higher number of needles per cm(3) (> or = 0.5) resulted in improved late urinary, bowel and sexual function scores. CONCLUSION: Quality of life after a permanent implant can be improved by using an adequate amount of sources and needles. With an increasing number of seeds per cm(3), dose homogeneity is improving. A prostate D(90) < 170 Gy and a base of seminal vesicle D(10) < 190 Gy (as an indicator of the dose to the bladder neck and urethral sphincter) can be recommended to maintain a satisfactory urinary function.
PURPOSE: To determine dosimetric risk factors for increased toxicity after permanent interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Quality of life questionnaires (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite) of 60 and 56 patients were analyzed after a median posttreatment time of 6 weeks (A-acute) and 16 months (L-late). The corresponding CT scans were performed 30 days after the implant. The prostate, rectal wall, and base of seminal vesicles were contoured. Prostate volume, number of seeds and needles as well as dosimetric parameters were correlated with the morbidity scores. RESULTS: For a prostate volume of 38 +/- 12 cm(3) (mean +/- standard deviation), 54 +/- 7 (125)I sources (Rapid Strands), activity of 22.6 +/- 3.0 MBq [0.61 +/- 0.08 mCi]) were implanted using 20 +/- 6 needles. Improved late urinary function scores resulted from a higher number of sources per cm(3) (> or = 1.35). A prostate D(90) < 170 Gy (A)/< 185 Gy (L) and base of seminal vesicle D(10) < 190 Gy (A and L) were associated with higher urinary function scores. Late rectal function scores were significantly higher for patients with a prostate V(200) < 50% and V(150) < 75%. Patients with a prostate volume < 40 cm(3) reached better sexual function scores (A and L). A higher number of needles per cm(3) (> or = 0.5) resulted in improved late urinary, bowel and sexual function scores. CONCLUSION: Quality of life after a permanent implant can be improved by using an adequate amount of sources and needles. With an increasing number of seeds per cm(3), dose homogeneity is improving. A prostate D(90) < 170 Gy and a base of seminal vesicle D(10) < 190 Gy (as an indicator of the dose to the bladder neck and urethral sphincter) can be recommended to maintain a satisfactory urinary function.
Authors: Faycal El Majdoub; Anna Brunn; Frank Berthold; Volker Sturm; Mohammad Maarouf Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2009-02-25 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Adam Ferro; Hee Joon Bae; Gayane Yenokyan; Yi Le; Todd McNutt; Omar Mian; Carol Gergis; Chloe Haviland; Theodore L DeWeese; Daniel Y Song Journal: Brachytherapy Date: 2017-11-23 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: E Le Fur; J P Malhaire; D Baverez; F Delage; M A Perrouin-Verbe; F Schlurmann; S Guerif; G Fournier; O Pradier; A Valeri Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2012-11-11 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: F Guedea; M Ferrer; J Pera; F Aguiló; A Boladeras; J F Suárez; O Cunillera; F Ferrer; Y Pardo; E Martínez; M Ventura Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Steven P Register; Rajat J Kudchadker; Lawrence B Levy; David A Swanson; Thomas J Pugh; Teresa L Bruno; Steven J Frank Journal: Brachytherapy Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Michael Pinkawa; Marc D Piroth; Branka Asadpour; Bernd Gagel; Karin Fischedick; Jaroslav Siluschek; Mareike Kehl; Barbara Krenkel; Michael J Eble Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2009-02-25 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Lara Hathout; Michael R Folkert; Marisa A Kollmeier; Yoshiya Yamada; Gil'ad N Cohen; Michael J Zelefsky Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-10-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Kazuma Kobayashi; Naoya Murakami; Kana Takahashi; Koji Inaba; Hiroshi Igaki; Ryuji Hamamoto; Jun Itami Journal: In Vivo Date: 2019 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Michael Pinkawa; Karin Fischedick; Bernd Gagel; Marc D Piroth; Branka Asadpour; Jens Klotz; Holger Borchers; Gerhard Jakse; Michael J Eble Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2009-08-24 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Rafael Trindade Tatit; Paulo Eduardo Albuquerque Zito Raffa; Giovana Cassia de Almeida Motta; André Alexandre Bocchi; Júlia Loripe Guimaraes; Paulo Roberto Franceschini; Paulo Henrique Pires de Aguiar Journal: Surg Neurol Int Date: 2021-06-21