Literature DB >> 17068220

Sensitivity of the cross-correlation between simulated surface EMGs for two muscles to detect motor unit synchronization.

Kevin G Keenan1, Dario Farina, François G Meyer, Roberto Merletti, Roger M Enoka.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the use of cross-correlation analysis between simulated surface electromyograms (EMGs) of two muscles to quantify motor unit synchronization. The volume conductor simulated a cylindrical limb with two muscles and bone, fat, and skin tissues. Models of two motor neuron pools were used to simulate 120 s of surface EMG that were detected over both muscles. Short-term synchrony was established using a phenomenological model that aligned the discharge times of selected motor units within and across muscles to simulate physiological levels of motor unit synchrony. The correlation between pairs of surface EMGs was estimated as the maximum of the normalized cross-correlation function. After imposing four levels of motor unit synchrony across muscles, five parameters were varied concurrently in the two muscles to examine their influence on the correlation between the surface EMGs: 1) excitation level (5, 10, 15, and 50% of maximum); 2) muscle size (350 and 500 motor units); 3) fat thickness (1 and 4 mm); 4) skin conductivity (0.1 and 1 S/m); and 5) mean motor unit conduction velocity (2.5 and 4 m/s). Despite a constant and high level of motor unit synchronization among pairs of motor units across the two muscles, the cross-correlation index ranged from 0.08 to 0.56, with variation in the five parameters. For example, cross-correlation of EMGs from pairs of hand muscles, each having thin layers of subcutaneous fat and mean motor unit conduction velocities of 4 m/s, may be relatively insensitive to the level of synchronization across muscles. In contrast, cross-correlation of EMGs from pairs of leg muscles, with larger fat thickness, may exhibit a different sensitivity. These results indicate that cross correlation of the surface EMGs from two muscles provides a limited measure of the level of synchronization between motor units in the two muscles.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17068220     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00491.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  10 in total

1.  Extraction of individual muscle mechanical action from endpoint force.

Authors:  Jason J Kutch; Arthur D Kuo; William Z Rymer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Assessment of across-muscle coherence using multi-unit vs. single-unit recordings.

Authors:  Jamie A Johnston; Gabriele Formicone; Thomas M Hamm; Marco Santello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Identification of common synaptic inputs to motor neurons from the rectified electromyogram.

Authors:  Dario Farina; Francesco Negro; Ning Jiang
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG: an update.

Authors:  Dario Farina; Roberto Merletti; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2014-10-02

5.  A simulation-based analysis of motor unit number index (MUNIX) technique using motoneuron pool and surface electromyogram models.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Li; William Zev Rymer; Ping Zhou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Hand dominance during constant force isometric contractions: evidence of different cortical drive commands.

Authors:  Rafael Pereira; Ivna Vidal Freire; Cláudia Virgínia Galindo Cavalcanti; Carla Patrícia Novais Luz; Osmar Pinto Neto
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Endpoint force fluctuations reveal flexible rather than synergistic patterns of muscle cooperation.

Authors:  Jason J Kutch; Arthur D Kuo; Anthony M Bloch; William Z Rymer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Association of anthropometric parameters with amplitude and crosstalk of mechanomyographic signals during forearm flexion, pronation and supination torque tasks.

Authors:  Irsa Talib; Kenneth Sundaraj; Chee Kiang Lam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Cross-talk in mechanomyographic signals from the forearm muscles during sub-maximal to maximal isometric grip force.

Authors:  Md Anamul Islam; Kenneth Sundaraj; R Badlishah Ahmad; Sebastian Sundaraj; Nizam Uddin Ahamed; Md Asraf Ali
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Analysis of the crosstalk in mechanomyographic signals along the longitudinal, lateral and transverse axes of elbow flexor muscles during sustained isometric forearm flexion, supination and pronation exercises.

Authors:  Irsa Talib; Kenneth Sundaraj; Chee Kiang Lam
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 2.041

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.