MOTIVATION: Annotation databases are widely used as public repositories of biological knowledge. However, most of these resources have been developed by independent groups which used different designs and different identifiers for the same biological entities. As we show in this article, incoherent name spaces between various databases represent a serious impediment to using the existing annotations at their full potential. Navigating between various such name spaces by mapping IDs from one database to another is a very important issue which is not properly addressed at the moment. RESULTS: We have developed a web-based resource, Onto-Translate (OT), which effectively addresses this problem. OT is able to map onto each other different types of biological entities from the following annotation databases: Swiss-Prot, TrEMBL, NREF, PIR, Gene Ontology, KEGG, Entrez Gene, GenBank, GenPept, IMAGE, RefSeq, UniGene, OMIM, PDB, Eukaryotic Promoter Database, HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee and NetAffx. Currently, OT is able to perform 462 types of mappings between 29 different types of IDs from 17 databases concerning 53 organisms. Among these, over 300 types of translations and 15 types of IDs are not currently supported by any other tool or resource. On average, OT is able to correctly map between 96 and 99% of the biological entities provided as input. In terms of speed, sets of approximately 20 000 IDs can be translated in <30 s, in most cases. AVAILABILITY: OT is a part of Onto-Tools, which is freely available at http://vortex.cs.wayne.edu/Projects.html
MOTIVATION: Annotation databases are widely used as public repositories of biological knowledge. However, most of these resources have been developed by independent groups which used different designs and different identifiers for the same biological entities. As we show in this article, incoherent name spaces between various databases represent a serious impediment to using the existing annotations at their full potential. Navigating between various such name spaces by mapping IDs from one database to another is a very important issue which is not properly addressed at the moment. RESULTS: We have developed a web-based resource, Onto-Translate (OT), which effectively addresses this problem. OT is able to map onto each other different types of biological entities from the following annotation databases: Swiss-Prot, TrEMBL, NREF, PIR, Gene Ontology, KEGG, Entrez Gene, GenBank, GenPept, IMAGE, RefSeq, UniGene, OMIM, PDB, Eukaryotic Promoter Database, HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee and NetAffx. Currently, OT is able to perform 462 types of mappings between 29 different types of IDs from 17 databases concerning 53 organisms. Among these, over 300 types of translations and 15 types of IDs are not currently supported by any other tool or resource. On average, OT is able to correctly map between 96 and 99% of the biological entities provided as input. In terms of speed, sets of approximately 20 000 IDs can be translated in <30 s, in most cases. AVAILABILITY: OT is a part of Onto-Tools, which is freely available at http://vortex.cs.wayne.edu/Projects.html
Authors: H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2000-01-01 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: M Ashburner; C A Ball; J A Blake; D Botstein; H Butler; J M Cherry; A P Davis; K Dolinski; S S Dwight; J T Eppig; M A Harris; D P Hill; L Issel-Tarver; A Kasarskis; S Lewis; J C Matese; J E Richardson; M Ringwald; G M Rubin; G Sherlock Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Cathy H Wu; Lai-Su L Yeh; Hongzhan Huang; Leslie Arminski; Jorge Castro-Alvear; Yongxing Chen; Zhangzhi Hu; Panagiotis Kourtesis; Robert S Ledley; Baris E Suzek; C R Vinayaka; Jian Zhang; Winona C Barker Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2003-01-01 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Maximilian Diehn; Gavin Sherlock; Gail Binkley; Heng Jin; John C Matese; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Christian A Rees; J Michael Cherry; David Botstein; Patrick O Brown; Ash A Alizadeh Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2003-01-01 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Guoying Liu; Ann E Loraine; Ron Shigeta; Melissa Cline; Jill Cheng; Venu Valmeekam; Shaw Sun; David Kulp; Michael A Siani-Rose Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2003-01-01 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Hongzhan Huang; Peter B McGarvey; Baris E Suzek; Raja Mazumder; Jian Zhang; Yongxing Chen; Cathy H Wu Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2011-04-15 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Tara K Sigdel; Amit Kaushal; Marina Gritsenko; Angela D Norbeck; Wei-Jun Qian; Wenzhong Xiao; David G Camp; Richard D Smith; Minnie M Sarwal Journal: Proteomics Clin Appl Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Yoshiaki Hasegawa; Jeffrey J Mans; Song Mao; M Cecilia Lopez; Henry V Baker; Martin Handfield; Richard J Lamont Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2007-02-16 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Mikhail G Dozmorov; Robert E Hurst; Daniel J Culkin; Bradley P Kropp; Mark Barton Frank; Jeanette Osban; Trevor M Penning; Hsueh-Kung Lin Journal: Prostate Date: 2009-07-01 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Roger S Day; Kevin K McDade; Uma R Chandran; Alex Lisovich; Thomas P Conrads; Brian L Hood; V S Kumar Kolli; David Kirchner; Traci Litzi; G Larry Maxwell Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2011-05-27 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Alexey V Antonov; Sabine Dietmann; Philip Wong; Dominik Lutter; Hans W Mewes Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2009-05-06 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Da Wei Huang; Brad T Sherman; Robert Stephens; Michael W Baseler; H Clifford Lane; Richard A Lempicki Journal: Bioinformation Date: 2008-07-30