BACKGROUND/AIMS: Previous studies have demonstrated that during transition from chronic liver disease to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), autoantibodies can appear which are not detected in the prior pre-malignant conditions. These antibody responses may be stimulated by cellular proteins involved in carcinogenesis. This study determines the prevalence of antibodies to a selected panel of eight tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) in sera from patients with chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis and HCC, and considers the possibility and usefulness of antibodies to such a panel of TAAs in differentiating between these conditions. The panel of eight TAAs includes Imp1, p62, Koc, p53, c-myc, cyclin B1, survivin and p16 full-length recombinant proteins. METHODS: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to detect antibodies against eight selected TAAs in 30 sera from chronic hepatitis, 30 from liver cirrhosis, and 142 from HCC. Positive results were also confirmed by slot blot, Western blotting and immunoprecipitation assay. RESULTS: Antibody frequency to any individual TAA in HCC varied from 9.9% to 21.8%. With the successive addition of TAAs to a final total of eight antigens, there was a stepwise increase of positive antibody reactions reaching a frequency of 59.8% with whole cohort of HCC patients. This was significantly higher than the frequency of antibodies in chronic hepatitis (20%), liver cirrhosis (30%) and normal individuals (12.2%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that malignant transition to HCC is associated with increased autoantibody responses to certain cellular proteins which might have a role in tumorigenesis, and shows that a mini-array of eight TAAs enhanced antibody detection for diagnosis of HCC. More studies in patients with HCC and precursor conditions such as chronic hepatitis, alcoholic hepatitis and liver cirrhosis using enlarged TAA mini-array panels might further improve the sensitivity and specificity of this mode of cancer immunodiagnosis. Its additional usefulness might be in the early detection of cancer in some patients with predisposing conditions.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Previous studies have demonstrated that during transition from chronic liver disease to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), autoantibodies can appear which are not detected in the prior pre-malignant conditions. These antibody responses may be stimulated by cellular proteins involved in carcinogenesis. This study determines the prevalence of antibodies to a selected panel of eight tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) in sera from patients with chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis and HCC, and considers the possibility and usefulness of antibodies to such a panel of TAAs in differentiating between these conditions. The panel of eight TAAs includes Imp1, p62, Koc, p53, c-myc, cyclin B1, survivin and p16 full-length recombinant proteins. METHODS: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to detect antibodies against eight selected TAAs in 30 sera from chronic hepatitis, 30 from liver cirrhosis, and 142 from HCC. Positive results were also confirmed by slot blot, Western blotting and immunoprecipitation assay. RESULTS: Antibody frequency to any individual TAA in HCC varied from 9.9% to 21.8%. With the successive addition of TAAs to a final total of eight antigens, there was a stepwise increase of positive antibody reactions reaching a frequency of 59.8% with whole cohort of HCC patients. This was significantly higher than the frequency of antibodies in chronic hepatitis (20%), liver cirrhosis (30%) and normal individuals (12.2%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that malignant transition to HCC is associated with increased autoantibody responses to certain cellular proteins which might have a role in tumorigenesis, and shows that a mini-array of eight TAAs enhanced antibody detection for diagnosis of HCC. More studies in patients with HCC and precursor conditions such as chronic hepatitis, alcoholic hepatitis and liver cirrhosis using enlarged TAA mini-array panels might further improve the sensitivity and specificity of this mode of cancer immunodiagnosis. Its additional usefulness might be in the early detection of cancer in some patients with predisposing conditions.
Authors: Takashi Himoto; Shigeki Kuriyama; Jian-Ying Zhang; Edward K L Chan; Yasuhiko Kimura; Tsutomu Masaki; Naohito Uchida; Mikio Nishioka; Eng M Tan Journal: Int J Oncol Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 5.650
Authors: Xiaoju Wang; Jianjun Yu; Arun Sreekumar; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Ronglai Shen; Donald Giacherio; Rohit Mehra; James E Montie; Kenneth J Pienta; Martin G Sanda; Philip W Kantoff; Mark A Rubin; John T Wei; Debashis Ghosh; Arul M Chinnaiyan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-09-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M Lu; R M Nakamura; E D Dent; J Y Zhang; F C Nielsen; J Christiansen; E K Chan; E M Tan Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Fu-Dong Shi; Jian-Ying Zhang; Daorong Liu; Ann Rearden; Max Elliot; Dan Nachtsheim; Tracy Daniels; Carlos A Casiano; Mary Jo Heeb; Edward K L Chan; Eng M Tan Journal: Prostate Date: 2005-05-15 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Kok Sun Looi; Ernesto S Nakayasu; Raquel A de Diaz; Eng M Tan; Igor C Almeida; Jian-Ying Zhang Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2008-08-02 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Xi Chen; Ke Dong; Min Long; Fang Lin; Xi Wang; Junxia Wei; Jihong Ren; Huizhong Zhang Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2012-05-25 Impact factor: 2.967