Literature DB >> 17067418

Standard errors in covariance structure models: asymptotics versus bootstrap.

Ke-Hai Yuan1, Kentaro Hayashi.   

Abstract

Commonly used formulae for standard error (SE) estimates in covariance structure analysis are derived under the assumption of a correctly specified model. In practice, a model is at best only an approximation to the real world. It is important to know whether the estimates of SEs as provided by standard software are consistent when a model is misspecified, and to understand why if not. Bootstrap procedures provide nonparametric estimates of SEs that automatically account for distribution violation. It is also necessary to know whether bootstrap estimates of SEs are consistent. This paper studies the relationship between the bootstrap estimates of SEs and those based on asymptotics. Examples are used to illustrate various versions of asymptotic variance-covariance matrices and their validity. Conditions for the consistency of the bootstrap estimates of SEs are identified and discussed. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate the relationship of different estimates of SEs and covariance matrices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17067418     DOI: 10.1348/000711005X85896

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1102            Impact factor:   3.380


  9 in total

1.  A Penalized Likelihood Method for Structural Equation Modeling.

Authors:  Po-Hsien Huang; Hung Chen; Li-Jen Weng
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Some Improvements in Confidence Intervals for Standardized Regression Coefficients.

Authors:  Paul Dudgeon
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Testing the Difference Between Reliability Coefficients Alpha and Omega.

Authors:  Lifang Deng; Wai Chan
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.821

4.  Analytic standard errors for exploratory process factor analysis.

Authors:  Guangjian Zhang; Michael W Browne; Anthony D Ong; Sy Miin Chow
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Information matrices and standard errors for MLEs of item parameters in IRT.

Authors:  Ke-Hai Yuan; Ying Cheng; Jeff Patton
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  A comparison of multiple imputation strategies to deal with missing nonnormal data in structural equation modeling.

Authors:  Fan Jia; Wei Wu
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-08-29

7.  Model-implied instrumental variable-generalized method of moments (MIIV-GMM) estimators for latent variable models.

Authors:  Kenneth A Bollen; Stanislav Kolenikov; Shawn Bauldry
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 2.500

8.  Structural Equation Modeling With Many Variables: A Systematic Review of Issues and Developments.

Authors:  Lifang Deng; Miao Yang; Katerina M Marcoulides
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-25

9.  Kindergarten Obesity and Academic Achievement: The Mediating Role of Weight Bias.

Authors:  Baeksan Yu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-04-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.