OBJECTIVES: This prospective longitudinal clinical study analyses the therapy outcome of 365 patients with either chronic neck (n = 134) or low back (n = 231) pain treated with a multidisciplinary biopsychosocial therapy approach. METHODS: Patients with chronic neck pain (NP) or low back pain (LBP) for 3 months or longer, corresponding sick leave for longer than 6 weeks, and clearly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria underwent a 3-week standardized inpatient multidisciplinary biopsychosocial therapy. Baseline sociodemographic, occupational, functional, and psychological data at entry into the study (T0) were comparable in both groups. At the 6-month follow-up (T1), five different therapy outcomes were analysed in both groups: back-to-work status, generic health status (the 36-item Short Form Health Survey, SF-36), pain intensity (visual analogue scale), functional capacity (Hannover back capacity score), and satisfaction with the therapy. RESULTS: Both treatment groups improved significantly in all outcome criteria between T0 and T1. In the total group, the back-to-work rate was 67.4%. At the final follow-up there were no significant differences between the group with chronic NP and the group with chronic LBP in the outcome criteria back-to-work status, improvement of health status and functional capacity, satisfaction with therapy, and reduction of pain. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of the main results of this study suggests that patients with chronic NP also derive significant benefit from a multidisciplinary treatment strategy, demonstrated in the literature so far mainly for patients with chronic LBP.
OBJECTIVES: This prospective longitudinal clinical study analyses the therapy outcome of 365 patients with either chronic neck (n = 134) or low back (n = 231) pain treated with a multidisciplinary biopsychosocial therapy approach. METHODS:Patients with chronic neck pain (NP) or low back pain (LBP) for 3 months or longer, corresponding sick leave for longer than 6 weeks, and clearly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria underwent a 3-week standardized inpatient multidisciplinary biopsychosocial therapy. Baseline sociodemographic, occupational, functional, and psychological data at entry into the study (T0) were comparable in both groups. At the 6-month follow-up (T1), five different therapy outcomes were analysed in both groups: back-to-work status, generic health status (the 36-item Short Form Health Survey, SF-36), pain intensity (visual analogue scale), functional capacity (Hannover back capacity score), and satisfaction with the therapy. RESULTS: Both treatment groups improved significantly in all outcome criteria between T0 and T1. In the total group, the back-to-work rate was 67.4%. At the final follow-up there were no significant differences between the group with chronic NP and the group with chronic LBP in the outcome criteria back-to-work status, improvement of health status and functional capacity, satisfaction with therapy, and reduction of pain. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of the main results of this study suggests that patients with chronic NP also derive significant benefit from a multidisciplinary treatment strategy, demonstrated in the literature so far mainly for patients with chronic LBP.
Authors: B Nagel; M Pfingsten; T Brinkschmidt; H-R Casser; I Gralow; D Irnich; K Klimczyk; R Sabatowski; M Schiltenwolf; R Sittl; W Söllner; B Arnold Journal: Schmerz Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 1.107
Authors: H-R Casser; B Arnold; T Brinkschmidt; I Gralow; D Irnich; K Klimczyk; B Nagel; M Pfingsten; M Schiltenwolf; R Sittl; W Söllner Journal: Schmerz Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 1.107
Authors: Mark P Jensen; Amy J Hoffman; Brenda L Stoelb; Richard T Abresch; Gregory T Carter; Craig M McDonald Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: B Arnold; H-R Casser; K Klimczyk; J Lutz; T Brinkschmidt; I Gralow; D Irnich; U Kaiser; B Nagel; M Schiltenwolf; M Pfingsten; R Sabatowski; W Söllner Journal: Schmerz Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 1.107