Literature DB >> 27349235

[Clinical studies on multimodal pain therapy : Standardized measurement of therapy outcomes with a core outcome set].

S Deckert1, R Sabatowski2,3, J Schmitt1, U Kaiser4.   

Abstract

Decision making in evidence-based medicine is based on general data on therapy outcomes as well as the effectiveness and safety in specific patient populations. Typically, findings concerning therapy outcomes from different studies are aggregated for a final conclusion. In this context a comparison of results is hampered by studies in which therapy outcomes are heterogeneously measured. Such methodological challenges exist for almost all areas of medical treatment, as well as for multimodal pain therapy (MMPT). Through establishing core outcome sets (COS) the required standardization of measurement of therapy outcomes in clinical research can be achieved. A COS is an evidence-based and consented minimum set consisting of outcome domains (i.e. partial aspects of the medical condition to be investigated, which have to be measured in order to give the best possible demonstration of therapy outcome of an intervention) accomplished by valid, reliable and sensitive measurement instruments which should be applied in each clinical trial. No such COS has so far been found for MMPT. The aim of this article is to give an overview about currently recommended methodological approaches to develop a COS accompanied by a brief introduction about existing COS initiatives focusing on chronic pain. The existing COS recommendations are discussed and conclusions are drawn on whether existing recommendations could also be applied for MMPT. Finally, the impact of healthcare research in Germany on a standardized assessment of therapy outcome in MMPT is outlined.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic pain; Health services research; Pain management; Patient outcome assessment; Treatment outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27349235     DOI: 10.1007/s00482-016-0123-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schmerz        ISSN: 0932-433X            Impact factor:   1.107


  56 in total

1.  Intensity of Chronic Pain--The Wrong Metric?

Authors:  Jane C Ballantyne; Mark D Sullivan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  [Effects of interdisciplinary functional restoration treatment with cognitive behavior therapy in patients with chronic back pain: healthcare research in the context of selective contracts].

Authors:  K Hafenbrack; M Heinrich; G Müller; U Marnitz; J Mallwitz; R Klinger
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 3.  [Recommendations of the updated LONTS guidelines. Long-term opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain].

Authors:  W Häuser; F Bock; P Engeser; G Hege-Scheuing; M Hüppe; G Lindena; C Maier; H Norda; L Radbruch; R Sabatowski; M Schäfer; M Schiltenwolf; M Schuler; H Sorgatz; T Tölle; A Willweber-Strumpf; F Petzke
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  Towards an ICF- and IMMPACT-based pain vocational rehabilitation core set in the Netherlands.

Authors:  M F Reneman; T T Beemster; M J A Edelaar; J M van Velzen; C van Bennekom; R Escorpizo
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-12

5.  Identifying the clinical domains of fibromyalgia: contributions from clinician and patient Delphi exercises.

Authors:  Phillip J Mease; Lesley M Arnold; Leslie J Crofford; David A Williams; I Jon Russell; Louise Humphrey; Linda Abetz; Susan A Martin
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2008-07-15

6.  [The Dachau multidisciplinary treatment program for chronic pain. Efficacy data of a diagnosis-independent multidisciplinary treatment program for back pain and other types of chronic pain].

Authors:  K Pöhlmann; T Tonhauser; P Joraschky; B Arnold
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.107

7.  [Development and evaluation of the multidimensional German pain questionnaire].

Authors:  B Nagel; H U Gerbershagen; G Lindena; M Pfingsten
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.107

8.  The Harmonizing Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) roadmap: a methodological framework to develop core sets of outcome measurements in dermatology.

Authors:  Jochen Schmitt; Christian Apfelbacher; Phyllis I Spuls; Kim S Thomas; Eric L Simpson; Masutaka Furue; Joanne Chalmers; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 8.551

9.  Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider.

Authors:  Paula R Williamson; Douglas G Altman; Jane M Blazeby; Mike Clarke; Declan Devane; Elizabeth Gargon; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 10.  Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative: protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a 'core outcome set'.

Authors:  Cecilia A C Prinsen; Sunita Vohra; Michael R Rose; Susanne King-Jones; Sana Ishaque; Zafira Bhaloo; Denise Adams; Caroline B Terwee
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Core Outcome Sets and Multidimensional Assessment Tools for Harmonizing Outcome Measure in Chronic Pain and Back Pain.

Authors:  Ulrike Kaiser; Katrin Neustadt; Christian Kopkow; Jochen Schmitt; Rainer Sabatowski
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2016-08-29

Review 2.  Treatment Efficacy, Clinical Utility, and Cost-Effectiveness of Multidisciplinary Biopsychosocial Rehabilitation Treatments for Persistent Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cornelia Rolli Salathé; Markus Melloh; Rebecca Crawford; Stephanie Scherrer; Norbert Boos; Achim Elfering
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-04-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.