Literature DB >> 17062400

Lumbar microdiscectomy and microendoscopic discectomy.

Ron I Riesenburger1, Carlos A David.   

Abstract

Lumbar microdiscectomy, which relies on the operating microscope for visualization, was first described in the late 1970s. This operation is considered the gold standard procedure for patients who require surgery for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation causing radiculopathy that has not improved with conservative measures. A new approach to the management of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation, microendoscopic discectomy, was introduced in 1997. This operation utilizes a tubular retractor system and a microendoscope for visualization rather than the operating microscope. As it is a new procedure, long-term outcomes have not yet been established for this operation. However, recent literature suggests that microendoscopic discectomy may be as effective as the traditional lumbar microdiscectomy in relieving radiculopathy. This article describes the operative techniques and outcomes reported in the literature for both lumbar microdiscectomy and microendoscopic discectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17062400     DOI: 10.1080/13645700600958432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol        ISSN: 1364-5706            Impact factor:   2.442


  12 in total

1.  The efficacy of minimally invasive discectomy compared with open discectomy: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Hormuzdiyar H Dasenbrock; Stephen P Juraschek; Lonni R Schultz; Timothy F Witham; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ali Bydon
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-03-09

Review 2.  Is sequestrectomy a viable alternative to microdiscectomy? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Bahram Fakouri; Nitin R Shetty; Thomas C H White
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Minimally Invasive Muscle Sparing Transmuscular Microdiscectomy : Technique and Comparison with Conventional Subperiosteal Microdiscectomy during the Early Postoperative Period.

Authors:  Beom-Seok Park; Young-Joon Kwon; Yu-Sam Won; Hyun-Chul Shin
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-09-30

4.  Sequestrectomy versus microdiscectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Teng Huang; Zhi Tian; Mengya Li; Wang Zheng; Long Zhang; Jia Chen; Jinshuai Zhai; Xicheng Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-15

5.  Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes after automated open lumbar discectomy and conventional microdiscectomy: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Sang-Ho Lee; Jun Seok Bae
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

6.  Microdiscectomy or tubular discectomy: Is any of them a better option for management of lumbar disc prolapse.

Authors:  Pallav S Bhatia; Harvinder S Chhabra; Bibhudendu Mohapatra; Ankur Nanda; Gururaj Sangodimath; Rahul Kaul
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

7.  A case-control study on the treatment of protrusion of lumbar intervertebral disc through PELD and MED.

Authors:  Hong-Pu Song; Hong-Feng Sheng; Wei-Xing Xu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy compared with other surgeries for lumbar disc herniation: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoliang Bai; Yong Lian; Jie Wang; Hongxin Zhang; Meichao Jiang; Hao Zhang; Bo Pei; Changqing Hu; Qiang Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Return to play after conservative treatment in athletes with symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: a practice-based observational study.

Authors:  Jun Iwamoto; Yoshihiro Sato; Tsuyoshi Takeda; Hideo Matsumoto
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2011-03-18

Review 10.  Tubular microscopes discectomy versus conventional microdiscectomy for treating lumbar disk herniation: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xianbo Li; Hengrui Chang; Xianzhong Meng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.