Literature DB >> 17060819

Identification of measurement differences between English and Spanish language versions of the Mini-Mental State Examination. Detecting differential item functioning using MIMIC modeling.

Richard N Jones1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the extent to which measurement of adult cognitive functioning differs between Spanish and English language administrations of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is critical for inclusive, representative, and valid research of older adults in the United States.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to demonstrate the use of an item response theory (IRT) based structural equation model, that is, the MIMIC model (multiple indicators, multiple causes), to evaluate MMSE responses for evidence of differential item functioning (DIF) attributable to language of administration.
SUBJECTS: We studied participants in a dementia case registry study (n = 1546), 42% of whom were examined with the Spanish language MMSE.
RESULTS: Twelve of 21 items were identified as having significant uniform DIF. The 4 most discrepant included orientation to season, orientation to state, repeat phrase, and follow command. DIF accounted for two-thirds of the observed difference in underlying level of cognitive functioning between Spanish- and English-language administration groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Failing to account for measurement differences may lead to spurious inferences regarding language group differences in level of underlying level of cognitive functioning. The MIMIC model can be used to detect and adjust for such measurement differences in substantive research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17060819     DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245250.50114.0f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  56 in total

1.  Are clinical diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias affected by education and self-reported race?

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; Ellen Grober; Joseph P Eimicke; Amy R Ehrlich
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2012-02-06

2.  Analysis of differential item functioning in the depression item bank from the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS): An item response theory approach.

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; Katja Ocepek-Welikson; Marjorie Kleinman; Joseph P Eimicke; Paul K Crane; Richard N Jones; Jin-Shei Lai; Seung W Choi; Ron D Hays; Bryce B Reeve; Steven P Reise; Paul A Pilkonis; David Cella
Journal:  Psychol Sci Q       Date:  2009

3.  Measurement in a multi-ethnic society. Overview to the special issue.

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; Anita L Stewart; Leo S Morales; Sidney M Stahl
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Measurement Equivalence of English Versus Native Language Versions of the Kessler 6 (K6) Scale: An Examination in Three Asian American Groups.

Authors:  Yuri Jang; Daniel A Powers; Hyunwoo Yoon; Min-Kyoung Rhee; Nan Sook Park; David A Chiriboga
Journal:  Asian Am J Psychol       Date:  2018-04-02

5.  Differential item functioning and health assessment.

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; John A Fleishman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  lordif: An R Package for Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Iterative Hybrid Ordinal Logistic Regression/Item Response Theory and Monte Carlo Simulations.

Authors:  Seung W Choi; Laura E Gibbons; Paul K Crane
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 6.440

7.  Postpartum depressive symptoms across time and place: structural invariance of the Self-Reporting Questionnaire among women from the international, multi-site MAL-ED study.

Authors:  Laura L Pendergast; Rebecca J Scharf; Zeba A Rasmussen; Jessica C Seidman; Barbara A Schaefer; Erling Svensen; Fahmida Tofail; Beena Koshy; Margaret Kosek; Muneera A Rasheed; Reeba Roshan; Angelina Maphula; Rita Shrestha; Laura E Murray-Kolb
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 4.839

8.  The Mediated MIMIC Model for Understanding the Underlying Mechanism of DIF.

Authors:  Ying Cheng; Can Shao; Quinn N Lathrop
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.821

Review 9.  Modifying measures based on differential item functioning (DIF) impact analyses.

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; Mildred Ramirez; Richard N Jones; Seung Choi; Paul K Crane
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2012-03-15

10.  Depression is more than the sum score of its parts: individual DSM symptoms have different risk factors.

Authors:  E I Fried; R M Nesse; K Zivin; C Guille; S Sen
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 7.723

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.