Literature DB >> 17060357

High-resolution spatial normalization for microarrays containing embedded technical replicates.

Daniel S Yuan1, Rafael A Irizarry.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Microarray data are susceptible to a wide-range of artifacts, many of which occur on physical scales comparable to the spatial dimensions of the array. These artifacts introduce biases that are spatially correlated. The ability of current methodologies to detect and correct such biases is limited.
RESULTS: We introduce a new approach for analyzing spatial artifacts, termed 'conditional residual analysis for microarrays' (CRAM). CRAM requires a microarray design that contains technical replicates of representative features and a limited number of negative controls, but is free of the assumptions that constrain existing analytical procedures. The key idea is to extract residuals from sets of matched replicates to generate residual images. The residual images reveal spatial artifacts with single-feature resolution. Surprisingly, spatial artifacts were found to coexist independently as additive and multiplicative errors. Efficient procedures for bias estimation were devised to correct the spatial artifacts on both intensity scales. In a survey of 484 published single-channel datasets, variance fell 4- to 12-fold in 5% of the datasets after bias correction. Thus, inclusion of technical replicates in a microarray design affords benefits far beyond what one might expect with a conventional 'n = 5' averaging, and should be considered when designing any microarray for which randomization is feasible. AVAILABILITY: CRAM is implemented as version 2 of the hoptag software package for R, which is included in the Supplementary information.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17060357      PMCID: PMC2262854          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  27 in total

1.  A model for measurement error for gene expression arrays.

Authors:  D M Rocke; B Durbin
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  New normalization methods for cDNA microarray data.

Authors:  D L Wilson; M J Buckley; C A Helliwell; I W Wilson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  Microarray data analysis: from disarray to consolidation and consensus.

Authors:  David B Allison; Xiangqin Cui; Grier P Page; Mahyar Sabripour
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  A robust neural networks approach for spatial and intensity-dependent normalization of cDNA microarray data.

Authors:  A L Tarca; J E K Cooke; J Mackay
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Quantitative phenotypic analysis of yeast deletion mutants using a highly parallel molecular bar-coding strategy.

Authors:  D D Shoemaker; D A Lashkari; D Morris; M Mittmann; R W Davis
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  A DNA integrity network in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Xuewen Pan; Ping Ye; Daniel S Yuan; Xiaoling Wang; Joel S Bader; Jef D Boeke
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  "Harshlighting" small blemishes on microarrays.

Authors:  Mayte Suárez-Fariñas; Asifa Haider; Knut M Wittkowski
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Improved microarray methods for profiling the Yeast Knockout strain collection.

Authors:  Daniel S Yuan; Xuewen Pan; Siew Loon Ooi; Brian D Peyser; Forrest A Spencer; Rafael A Irizarry; Jef D Boeke
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Model selection and efficiency testing for normalization of cDNA microarray data.

Authors:  Matthias Futschik; Toni Crompton
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2004-07-30       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Normalization and analysis of DNA microarray data by self-consistency and local regression.

Authors:  Thomas B Kepler; Lynn Crosby; Kevin T Morgan
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2002-06-28       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  7 in total

1.  Background correction of two-colour cDNA microarray data using spatial smoothing methods.

Authors:  André Schützenmeister; Hans-Peter Piepho
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Probing nucleosome function: a highly versatile library of synthetic histone H3 and H4 mutants.

Authors:  Junbiao Dai; Edel M Hyland; Daniel S Yuan; Hailiang Huang; Joel S Bader; Jef D Boeke
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Spatial normalization improves the quality of genotype calling for Affymetrix SNP 6.0 arrays.

Authors:  High Seng Chai; Terry M Therneau; Kent R Bailey; Jean-Pierre A Kocher
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Systematic spatial bias in DNA microarray hybridization is caused by probe spot position-dependent variability in lateral diffusion.

Authors:  Doris Steger; David Berry; Susanne Haider; Matthias Horn; Michael Wagner; Roman Stocker; Alexander Loy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  BASH: a tool for managing BeadArray spatial artefacts.

Authors:  J M Cairns; M J Dunning; M E Ritchie; R Russell; A G Lynch
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  PanCGH: a genotype-calling algorithm for pangenome CGH data.

Authors:  Jumamurat R Bayjanov; Michiel Wels; Marjo Starrenburg; Johan E T van Hylckama Vlieg; Roland J Siezen; Douwe Molenaar
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  High-Throughput Multiparallel Enteropathogen Detection via Nano-Liter qPCR.

Authors:  Jessica A Grembi; Koshlan Mayer-Blackwell; Stephen P Luby; Alfred M Spormann
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 5.293

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.