BACKGROUND: Euthanasia and other end-of-life decisions are acceptable to the large majority of the Dutch public. Insight in the relationships of such acceptance, with characteristics considered important for a 'good death', may contribute to the understanding of this liberal attitude. METHOD: Questionnaires were mailed to 1777 members of the Dutch public (response: 78%), containing questions relating to a good death, attitudes towards euthanasia, terminal sedation and increasing morphine, and demographics. Associations between characteristics of a good death and attitudes towards these end-of-life decisions were analysed. FINDINGS: Characteristics that were considered important for a good death were: the possibility to say goodbye to loved ones (94%), dying with dignity (92%), being able to decide about end-of-life care (88%), and dying free of pain (87%). Acceptance of euthanasia, terminal sedation and increasing morphine were related to the wish to have a dignified death, and with concerns about burdening relatives with terminal care. Acceptance of euthanasia was also associated with the wish to be able to decide about medical end-of-life treatments and about the moment of death. INTERPRETATION: Besides saying farewell and dying pain free and with dignity, many members of the Dutch public consider values of control and maintenance of independence as important for a good death.
BACKGROUND: Euthanasia and other end-of-life decisions are acceptable to the large majority of the Dutch public. Insight in the relationships of such acceptance, with characteristics considered important for a 'good death', may contribute to the understanding of this liberal attitude. METHOD: Questionnaires were mailed to 1777 members of the Dutch public (response: 78%), containing questions relating to a good death, attitudes towards euthanasia, terminal sedation and increasing morphine, and demographics. Associations between characteristics of a good death and attitudes towards these end-of-life decisions were analysed. FINDINGS: Characteristics that were considered important for a good death were: the possibility to say goodbye to loved ones (94%), dying with dignity (92%), being able to decide about end-of-life care (88%), and dying free of pain (87%). Acceptance of euthanasia, terminal sedation and increasing morphine were related to the wish to have a dignified death, and with concerns about burdening relatives with terminal care. Acceptance of euthanasia was also associated with the wish to be able to decide about medical end-of-life treatments and about the moment of death. INTERPRETATION: Besides saying farewell and dying pain free and with dignity, many members of the Dutch public consider values of control and maintenance of independence as important for a good death.
Authors: Udo Schüklenk; Johannes J M van Delden; Jocelyn Downie; Sheila A M McLean; Ross Upshur; Daniel Weinstock Journal: Bioethics Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 1.898
Authors: S M Bruinsma; J Brown; A van der Heide; L Deliens; L Anquinet; S A Payne; J E Seymour; J A C Rietjens Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Emily A Meier; Jarred V Gallegos; Lori P Montross Thomas; Colin A Depp; Scott A Irwin; Dilip V Jeste Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2016-01-22 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Hilde T H van der Kallen; Natasja J H Raijmakers; Judith A C Rietjens; Alex A van der Male; Herman J Bueving; Johannes J M van Delden; Agnes van der Heide Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Eefje M Sizoo; Martin J B Taphoorn; Bernard Uitdehaag; Jan J Heimans; Luc Deliens; Jaap C Reijneveld; H Roeline W Pasman Journal: Oncologist Date: 2013-01-18
Authors: Judith A C Rietjens; Paul J van der Maas; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; Johannes J M van Delden; Agnes van der Heide Journal: J Bioeth Inq Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 1.352