Literature DB >> 17059837

Robotic cholecystectomy: learning curve, advantages, and limitations.

Tamas J Vidovszky1, William Smith, Jagannath Ghosh, Mohamed R Ali.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robotic cholecystectomy is safe, feasible procedure. Initial studies showed significant set up time and operating time but no clear clinical advantage of the robotic involvement. We have investigated the learning curve, advantages and limitation of the procedure.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed all (n = 51) robotic cholecystectomies performed between July 2004 and December 2005. The surgery was performed using the da Vinci system. We recorded operative time, setup time of robotics instrumentation, conversion to laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy and complication of the procedure.
RESULTS: Forty-eight of the 51 procedures (94%) were completed robotically. We did not experience any significant complications directly related to robotics surgery. The mean +/- SD operating time was 77 +/- 22.3 min. The mean setup time for robotics (from incision until robot was in place, including draping the robot) was 24 +/- 8.8 min. However, the setup time significantly improved as we gained more experience: from 30.6 +/- 10.7 min (first 16 cases) to 18.3 +/- 4.0 min (cases 33-48). The mean robotic time was 34 +/- 16.1 min. We observed no significant improvement in robotic procedure time.
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic cholecystectomy offers significant advantages such as three-dimensional view, easier instrument manipulations and possibility of remote site surgery. We observed some shortcomings of robotic surgery such as need for larger and additional ports, and need for undocking the machine in case of cholangiography or change of patient position. Our data shows that the learning curve is between 16 to 32 procedures to significantly decrease the setup time and total operating time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17059837     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2006.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  36 in total

1.  New classification of the anatomic variations of cystic artery during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  You-Ming Ding; Bin Wang; Wei-Xing Wang; Ping Wang; Ji-Shen Yan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a comprehensive cost analysis.

Authors:  Walaa F Abdelmoaty; Christy M Dunst; Chris Neighorn; Lee L Swanstrom; Chet W Hammill
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Getting started with robotics in general surgery with cholecystectomy: the Canadian experience.

Authors:  Shiva Jayaraman; Ward Davies; Christopher M Schlachta
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 4.  State of the art in robotic hepatobiliary surgery.

Authors:  Luca Milone; Despoina Daskalaki; Eduardo Fernandes; Isacco Damoli; Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Robotic single-site versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Which is cheaper? A cost report and analysis.

Authors:  Kareem Bedeir; Andrew Mann; Yassar Youssef
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: consensus conference-based guidelines.

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Nereo Vettoretto; Gianfranco Silecchia; Carlo Bergamini; Pietro Maida; Pietro Lombari; Piero Narilli; Domenico Marchi; Alessandro Carrara; Maria Grazia Esposito; Stefania Fiume; Giuseppe Miranda; Simona Barlera; Marina Davoli
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection: a comparative study from a single center.

Authors:  Young-Dong Yu; Ki-Hun Kim; Dong-Hwan Jung; Jung-Man Namkoong; Sam-Youl Yoon; Sung-Won Jung; Sang-Kyung Lee; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 8.  An appraisal of the learning curve in robotic general surgery.

Authors:  Luise I M Pernar; Faith C Robertson; Ali Tavakkoli; Eric G Sheu; David C Brooks; Douglas S Smink
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  A systematic review of the learning curve in robotic surgery: range and heterogeneity.

Authors:  I Kassite; T Bejan-Angoulvant; H Lardy; A Binet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Cholecystectomy using the Revo-i robotic surgical system from Korea: the first clinical study.

Authors:  Jin Hong Lim; Woo Jung Lee; Seung Ho Choi; Chang Moo Kang
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-09-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.