Literature DB >> 17058590

Comparison of skin dose between conventional radiotherapy and IMRT.

S Price1, M Williams, M Butson, P Metcalfe.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to measure skin dose using radiochromic film for two step-and-shoot IMRT fields and compare the results to the skin dose for a conventional open field. All exposures were made using a 6 MV photon beam produced by a Varian 21EX linear accelerator (Varian Medical Systems, CA, USA) equipped with a Millennium 120 leaf MLC. Three different field configurations were used, these were an open field, a step-and-shoot IMRT field and a clinical IMRT field. The mean ratio of the skin dose to dose at d(max) for an open 10 x 10 cm2 field at 100 cm SSD was 0.178 +/- 0.003. The step-and-shoot IMRT field consisted of 1 cm wide strips of decreasing intensity that were delivered using a step-and-shoot technique across a 10 x 10 cm2 field. The ratio of skin dose to dose at d(max) ranged from 0.180 to 0.257, with the low intensity steps having a higher relative skin dose compared to the high intensity steps. A model was derived that attributed these variations to the electron contamination from both the adjacent and more distant high intensity steps. The clinical field consisted of a 25 segment 9.8 x 10.0 cm2 beam arrangement. The ratio of skin dose to dose at d(max) for the clinical IMRT field ranged from 0.093 to 0.284. The results indicated that an IMRT field produced only minor changes in the relative skin dose, with variations potentially attributable to fluctuations in the electron contamination produced by neighbouring regions of different intensity. The use of an individual IMRT field does not significantly increase the skin dose above that of a conventional photon field.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17058590     DOI: 10.1007/bf03178577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med        ISSN: 0158-9938            Impact factor:   1.430


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of surface dose delivered by 7 MV-unflattened and 6 MV-flattened photon beams.

Authors:  Ashokkumar Sigamani; Arunai Nambiraj
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-04-25

2.  Dose verification of helical tomotherapy intensity modulated radiation therapy planning using 2D-array ion chambers.

Authors:  S Xu; C Xie; Z Ju; X Dai; H Gong; L Wang; J Yang
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2010-04-01

3.  Use of new radiochromic devices for peripheral dose measurement: potential in-vivo dosimetry application.

Authors:  S-T Chiu-Tsao; Mf Chan
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2009-10-01

4.  Is It Possible to Publish a Calibration Function for Radiochromic Film?

Authors:  Maria F Chan; David Lewis; Xiang Yu
Journal:  Int J Med Phys Clin Eng Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-01-29

5.  Assessment and Comparison of Homogeneity and Conformity Indexes in Step-and-Shoot and Compensator-Based Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3D CRT) in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Marzieh Salimi; Kaveh Shirani Tak Abi; Hassan Ali Nedaie; Hossein Hassani; Hussain Gharaati; Mahmood Samei; Rezgar Shahi; Hamed Zarei
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

6.  Evaluation and Validation of IBA I'MatriXX Array for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of TomoTherapy®.

Authors:  N V N Madhusudhana Sresty; A Krishnam Raju; B Nagarjuna Reddy; V C Sahithya; Yakub Mohmd; G Deleep Kumar; T Anil Kumar; Tasneem Rushdi; S Aparna; G Durga Prasad; Harjot Kaur Bajwa
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

7.  Estimation of Skin doses for Retrofit Prototype Multileaf Collimators Designed for Telecobalt Therapy Machine.

Authors:  Akula Roopa Rani; Komanduri Ayyangar; A R Reddy; Ayyalasomayajula Anil Kumar; Pal Reddy Yadagiri Reddy
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2021-02-02

8.  An investigation of the depth dose in the build-up region, and surface dose for a 6-MV therapeutic photon beam: Monte Carlo simulation and measurements.

Authors:  Lukkana Apipunyasopon; Somyot Srisatit; Nakorn Phaisangittisakul
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  Surface dose measurements and comparison of unflattened and flattened photon beams.

Authors:  Ashokkumar Sigamani; Arunai Nambiraj; Girigesh Yadav; Ananda Giribabu; Karthikeyan Srinivasan; Venkadamanickam Gurusamy; Kothanda Raman; Kaviarasu Karunakaran; Rajesh Thiyagarajan
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.