Literature DB >> 17057963

Results of an indoor size fractionated PM school sampling program in Libby, Montana.

Tony J Ward1, Curtis W Noonan, Kathi Hooper.   

Abstract

Libby, Montana is the only PM(2.5) non-attainment area in the western United States with the exceptions of parts of southern California. During January through March 2005, a particulate matter (PM) sampling program was conducted within Libby's elementary and middle schools to establish baseline indoor PM concentrations before a wood stove change-out program is implemented over the next several years. As part of this program, indoor concentrations of PM mass, organic carbon (OC), and elemental carbon (EC) in five different size fractions (>2.5, 1.0-2.5, 0.5-1.0, 0.25-0.5, and <0.25 microm) were measured. Total measured PM mass concentrations were much higher inside the elementary school, with particle size fraction (>2.5, 0.5-1.0, 0.25-0.5, and <0.25 microm) concentrations between 2 and 5 times higher when compared to the middle school. The 1.0-2.5 microm fraction had the largest difference between the two sites, with elementary school concentrations nearly 10 times higher than the middle school values. The carbon component for the schools' indoor PM was found to be predominantly composed of OC. Measured total OC and EC concentrations, as well as concentrations within individual size fractions, were an average of two to five times higher at the elementary school when compared to the middle school. For the ultrafine fraction (<0.25), EC concentrations were similar between each of the schools. Despite the differences in concentrations between the schools at the various fraction levels, the OC/EC ratio was determined to be similar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17057963     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-006-9386-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   3.307


  11 in total

1.  Relationship between outdoor and indoor air quality in eight French schools.

Authors:  P Blondeau; V Iordache; O Poupard; D Genin; F Allard
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.770

2.  Use of personal-indoor-outdoor sulfur concentrations to estimate the infiltration factor and outdoor exposure factor for individual homes and persons.

Authors:  Lance Wallace; Ron Williams
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 3.  Indoor particles: a review.

Authors:  L Wallace
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.235

4.  Personal sampling of particles in adults: relation among personal, indoor, and outdoor air concentrations.

Authors:  N A Janssen; G Hoek; B Brunekreef; H Harssema; I Mensink; A Zuidhof
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Indoor-outdoor air quality relationships.

Authors:  J E Yocom; W L Clink; W A Cote
Journal:  J Air Pollut Control Assoc       Date:  1971-05

6.  Indoor and outdoor air quality investigation at schools in Hong Kong.

Authors:  S C Lee; M Chang
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 7.086

7.  Relationships among personal, indoor, and outdoor fine and coarse particle concentrations for individuals with COPD.

Authors:  L Rojas-Bracho; H H Suh; P Koutrakis
Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2000 May-Jun

8.  Comparison of black smoke and PM2.5 levels in indoor and outdoor environments of four European cities.

Authors:  Thomas Gotschi; Lucy Oglesby; Patrick Mathys; Christian Monn; Nikos Manalis; Kimmo Koistinen; Matti Jantunen; Otto Hanninen; Liba Polanska; Nino Kunzli
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Determination of levoglucosan in atmospheric fine particulate matter.

Authors:  Christopher D Simpson; Russell L Dills; Bethany S Katz; David A Kalman
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.235

Review 10.  Approaches for assessing health risks from complex mixtures in indoor air: a panel overview.

Authors:  C J Henry; L Fishbein; W J Meggs; N A Ashford; P A Schulte; H Anderson; J S Osborne; D W Sepkovic
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  3 in total

1.  Concentrations, particle-size distributions, and indoor/outdoor differences of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in a middle school classroom in Xi'an, China.

Authors:  Hongmei Xu; Benjamin Guinot; Xinyi Niu; Junji Cao; Kin Fai Ho; Zhuohui Zhao; Steven Sai Hang Ho; Suixin Liu
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Adverse effects of wood smoke PM(2.5) exposure on macrophage functions.

Authors:  Christopher T Migliaccio; Emily Kobos; Quinton O King; Virginia Porter; Forrest Jessop; Tony Ward
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.724

3.  Urinary levoglucosan as a biomarker of wood smoke exposure: observations in a mouse model and in children.

Authors:  Christopher T Migliaccio; Megan A Bergauff; Christopher P Palmer; Forrest Jessop; Curtis W Noonan; Tony J Ward
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 9.031

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.