| Literature DB >> 17052335 |
Anke Franzke1, Robert Geffers, J Katrin Hunger, Susanne Pförtner, Wenji Piao, Philipp Ivanyi, Jens Grosse, Michael Probst-Kepper, Arnold Ganser, Jan Buer.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aplastic anemia (AA) is a bone marrow failure syndrome mostly characterized by an immune-mediated destruction of marrow hematopoietic progenitor/stem cells. The resulting hypocellularity limits a detailed analysis of the cellular immune response. To overcome this technical problem we performed a microarray analysis of CD3+ T-cells derived from bone marrow aspirates and peripheral blood samples of newly diagnosed AA patients and healthy volunteers. Two AA patients were additionally analyzed after achieving a partial remission following immunosuppression. The regulation of selected candidate genes was confirmed by real-time RT-PCR.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 17052335 PMCID: PMC1626471 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-263
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Patients' characteristics.
| 1 | 19/F | SAA | n | PB | y | n | I |
| 2 | 57/M | vSAA | n | PB | y | n | I |
| 3 | 40/F | SAA | n | PB | y | n | I |
| 4 | 70/F | SAA | n | PB | y | n | I |
| 5 | 64/M | SAA | n | PB | y | y | IIa/IIb |
| 6 | 70/F | vSAA | n | PB | y | y | IIa/IIb |
Abbreviations: F = female; M = male; (v)SAA = (very) severe aplastic anemia; n = no; y = yes; PB = peripheral blood; BM = bone marrow; I = pool I at initial presentation (n = 4); IIa = pool II at initial presentation (n = 2); IIb = pool II in hematological remission (n = 2). Disease classification was performed according to the International Study of Aplastic Anemia and Agranulocytosis [45].
Figure 1Results of differential transcriptome analysis in bone marrow-derived CD3+ T-cells of SAA patients. Genome-wide gene expression profiles of CD3+ T-cells derived from bone marrow aspirations of SAA patients and healthy volunteers were comparatively analyzed. The diagram summarizes the number of differentially expressed genes (> 2-fold) assigned to different functional classes.
Figure 2Gene expression profile analysis of normal T-cell subpopulations in comparison to differentially expressed genes in CD3+ T-cells of SAA patients. The gene expression data of effector memory T-cell populations were compared separately for each of 3 normal donors with the mean gene expression level of the respective naive T-cell populations [13, 14]. Significantly regulated genes (p < 0.05, student's t-test) were further analyzed in comparison to the differential gene expression pattern of SAA patients (pool I and pool IIa of the PB). Number of commonly and differentially expressed genes is shown for effector memory versus naïve CD4+ T-cells in comparison to circulating CD3+ T-cells of SAA patients (part A) and also for the respective CD8+ T-cell subpopulations (part B).
Figure 3Gene expression profiles of bone marrow-derived CD3+ T-cells of SAA patients at initial presentation and after hematological recovery. Hierarchical clustering analysis of gene expression patterns in CD3+ T-cells of 2 independent SAA patient pools at initial presentation (I and IIa) and in hematological remission (pool IIb) following immunosuppressive therapy were performed with respect to the expression profile of pooled CD3+ T-cells from healthy volunteers.
Figure 4Changed gene expression pattern following immunotherapy. Panel A: Hierarchical clustering analysis includes genes that tend to normalize after immunotherapy with respect to their gene expression levels detected in the normal control pools. In the SAA patient pool of bone-marrow derived T-cells 60 of 583 regulated genes turned to nearly normal gene expression levels after successful immunosuppression. Panel B: The comparison of the gene expression profiles from bone marrow-derived T-cells of the SAA pool before and after immunotherapy revealed several genes exhibiting a very high difference (> 4-fold) in their expression level.
Regulation of selected genes expressed in BM-derived T-cells of SAA patients.
| 207075_at | CIAS1 | cold autoinflammatory syndrome 1 | - 23.49 | - 6.29 | - 2.12 |
| 210118_s_at | IL-1 A | interleukin-1, alpha | - 25.90 | - 40.28 | - 3.49 |
| 220034_at | IRAK3 | interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 3 | - 5.91 | - 88.03 | - 2.18 |
| 204961_s_at | NCF1 | neutrophil cytosolic factor 1 | - 3.87 | - 2.23 | - 1.32 |
| 206390_x_at | PF4 | platelet factor 4 | - 156.82 | - 187.53 | - 11.81 |
| 211743_s_at | PRG2 | proteoglycan 2 | - 236.22 | - 78.96 | - 2.55 |
| 204924_at | TLR2 | toll-like receptor 2 | - 10.43 | - 5.04 | - 2.22 |
Abbreviations: I = pool I at initial presentation (n = 4); IIa = pool II at initial presentation (n = 2); IIb = pool II in hematological remission (n = 2).
Figure 5Validation of microarray results by real-time PCR. Selected genes (CXCL4, PRG2, CD26, CX3CR1) with differential gene expression in the analyzed SAA and control pools were quantified by Taqman RT-PCR in 2 independent experiments. Relative mRNA expression levels were normalized with respect to RPS9 gene expression as internal control. Results are shown as mean fold-change value of the respective gene expression in the control pool. Slanted bars: Microarray result; black bar: respective real-time RT-PCR result. Panel A shows upregulated genes. Panel B demonstrates downregulated genes.