Marcus Oldenburg1, Ute Latza, Xaver Baur. 1. Clinical Occupational Medicine, Institute of Occupational Medicine (ZfA), University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany. marcus.oldenburg@bsg.hamburg.de
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Preventive workplace regulations are so far not based on an ubiquitously accepted threshold for airborne endotoxin in the bioaerosol. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 150 employees of a cotton spinning mill underwent lung function testing. Furthermore, in a random subset of 75 textile workers cross-shift lung function test and methacholine challenges were performed. Airborne current endotoxin exposure was classified as "low", "medium", and "high" (<or=100, >100-<or=450, and >450 Endotoxin Units (EU)/m(3), respectively) based on endotoxin activity. RESULTS: The exposure-response relationship between current endotoxin exposure and prevalence of an obstructive ventilation pattern was significant (test for linear trend: P = 0.019); the adjusted odds ratio for high endotoxin exposure was 11.22 (95% confidence interval 1.03-121.17). Within individuals, FEV(1)/FVC% was significantly reduced after the shift (paired t test: P = 0.009) but not related to current endotoxin exposure. Twelve workers showed bronchial hyperresponsiveness (8.1% before and 12.2% after the work shift; Fisher's exact test: P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: The study among German cotton textile workers suggests an exposure-dependent effect of current endotoxin exposure on lung function impairment with significant effects above 450 EU/m(3).
OBJECTIVES: Preventive workplace regulations are so far not based on an ubiquitously accepted threshold for airborne endotoxin in the bioaerosol. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 150 employees of a cotton spinning mill underwent lung function testing. Furthermore, in a random subset of 75 textile workers cross-shift lung function test and methacholine challenges were performed. Airborne current endotoxin exposure was classified as "low", "medium", and "high" (<or=100, >100-<or=450, and >450 Endotoxin Units (EU)/m(3), respectively) based on endotoxin activity. RESULTS: The exposure-response relationship between current endotoxin exposure and prevalence of an obstructive ventilation pattern was significant (test for linear trend: P = 0.019); the adjusted odds ratio for high endotoxin exposure was 11.22 (95% confidence interval 1.03-121.17). Within individuals, FEV(1)/FVC% was significantly reduced after the shift (paired t test: P = 0.009) but not related to current endotoxin exposure. Twelve workers showed bronchial hyperresponsiveness (8.1% before and 12.2% after the work shift; Fisher's exact test: P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: The study among German cotton textile workers suggests an exposure-dependent effect of current endotoxin exposure on lung function impairment with significant effects above 450 EU/m(3).
Authors: Katja Radon; Brigitta Danuser; Martin Iversen; Eduard Monso; Christoph Weber; Jörg Hartung; Kelley Donham; Urban Palmgren; Dennis Nowak Journal: Ann Agric Environ Med Date: 2002 Impact factor: 1.447
Authors: D C Christiani; X R Wang; L D Pan; H X Zhang; B X Sun; H Dai; E A Eisen; D H Wegman; S A Olenchock Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Jing Shi; Jing-Qing Hang; Amar J Mehta; Hong-Xi Zhang; He-Lian Dai; Li Su; Ellen A Eisen; David C Christiani Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-03-25 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Virissa Lenters; Ioannis Basinas; Laura Beane-Freeman; Paolo Boffetta; Harvey Checkoway; David Coggon; Lützen Portengen; Malcolm Sim; Inge M Wouters; Dick Heederik; Roel Vermeulen Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2009-12-12 Impact factor: 2.506