Literature DB >> 17050923

Switched or not?: the structure of unphosphorylated CheY bound to the N terminus of FliM.

Collin M Dyer1, Frederick W Dahlquist.   

Abstract

Phosphorylation of Escherichia coli CheY increases its affinity for its target, FliM, 20-fold. The interaction between BeF(3)(-)-CheY, a phosphorylated CheY (CheY approximately P) analog, and the FliM sequence that it binds has been described previously in molecular detail. Although the conformation that unphosphorylated CheY adopts in complex with FliM was unknown, some evidence suggested that it is similar to that of CheY approximately P. To resolve the issue, we have solved the crystallographic structure of unphosphorylated, magnesium(II)-bound CheY in complex with a synthetic peptide corresponding to the target region of FliM (the 16 N-terminal residues of FliM [FliM(16)]). While the peptide conformation and binding site are similar to those of the BeF(3)(-)-CheY-FliM(16) complex, the inactive CheY conformation is largely retained in the unphosphorylated Mg(2+)-CheY-FliM(16) complex. Communication between the target binding site and the phosphorylation site, observed previously in biochemical experiments, is enabled by a network of conserved side chain interactions that partially mimic those observed in BeF(3)(-)-activated CheY. This structure makes clear the active role that the beta4-alpha4 loop plays in the Tyr(87)-Tyr(106) coupling mechanism that enables allosteric communication between the phosphorylation site and the target binding surface. Additionally, this structure provides a high-resolution view of an intermediate conformation of a response regulator protein, which had been generally assumed to be two state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17050923      PMCID: PMC1636273          DOI: 10.1128/JB.00637-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  25 in total

1.  C-terminal DNA binding stimulates N-terminal phosphorylation of the outer membrane protein regulator OmpR from Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S K Ames; N Frankema; L J Kenney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Crystal structure of activated CheY. Comparison with other activated receiver domains.

Authors:  S Y Lee; H S Cho; J G Pelton; D Yan; E A Berry; D E Wemmer
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-02-13       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  The role of a signaling protein in bacterial sensing: behavioral effects of increased gene expression.

Authors:  D O Clegg; D E Koshland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Magnesium binding to the bacterial chemotaxis protein CheY results in large conformational changes involving its functional surface.

Authors:  L Bellsolell; J Prieto; L Serrano; M Coll
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1994-05-13       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Crystal structure of an activated response regulator bound to its target.

Authors:  S Y Lee; H S Cho; J G Pelton; D Yan; R K Henderson; D S King; L Huang; S Kustu; E A Berry; D E Wemmer
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2001-01

6.  Structure of the constitutively active double mutant CheYD13K Y106W alone and in complex with a FliM peptide.

Authors:  Collin M Dyer; Michael L Quillin; Andres Campos; Justine Lu; Megan M McEvoy; Andrew C Hausrath; Edwin M Westbrook; Philip Matsumura; Brian W Matthews; Frederick W Dahlquist
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-09-24       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Structure of the Mg(2+)-bound form of CheY and mechanism of phosphoryl transfer in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  A M Stock; E Martinez-Hackert; B F Rasmussen; A H West; J B Stock; D Ringe; G A Petsko
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1993-12-14       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Proposed signal transduction role for conserved CheY residue Thr87, a member of the response regulator active-site quintet.

Authors:  J L Appleby; R B Bourret
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Reconciling the "old" and "new" views of protein allostery: a molecular simulation study of chemotaxis Y protein (CheY).

Authors:  Mark S Formaneck; Liang Ma; Qiang Cui
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-06-01

10.  Assignments, secondary structure, global fold, and dynamics of chemotaxis Y protein using three- and four-dimensional heteronuclear (13C,15N) NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  F J Moy; D F Lowry; P Matsumura; F W Dahlquist; J E Krywko; P J Domaille
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1994-09-06       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  59 in total

1.  Allosteric response is both conserved and variable across three CheY orthologs.

Authors:  James M Mottonen; Donald J Jacobs; Dennis R Livesay
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Segmental motions, not a two-state concerted switch, underlie allostery in CheY.

Authors:  Leanna R McDonald; Joshua A Boyer; Andrew L Lee
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 3.  Intrinsic dynamics of enzymes in the unbound state and relation to allosteric regulation.

Authors:  Ivet Bahar; Chakra Chennubhotla; Dror Tobi
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 6.809

4.  A link between dimerization and autophosphorylation of the response regulator PhoB.

Authors:  Rachel L Creager-Allen; Ruth E Silversmith; Robert B Bourret
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Structural basis of a physical blockage mechanism for the interaction of response regulator PmrA with connector protein PmrD from Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Authors:  Shih-Chi Luo; Yuan-Chao Lou; Mahalingam Rajasekaran; Yi-Wei Chang; Chwan-Deng Hsiao; Chinpan Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  The structures of T87I phosphono-CheY and T87I/Y106W phosphono-CheY help to explain their binding affinities to the FliM and CheZ peptides.

Authors:  Kenneth McAdams; Eric S Casper; R Matthew Haas; Bernard D Santarsiero; Aimee L Eggler; Andrew Mesecar; Christopher J Halkides
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 4.013

Review 7.  Allostery and cooperativity revisited.

Authors:  Qiang Cui; Martin Karplus
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Conformational dynamics are a key factor in signaling mediated by the receiver domain of a sensor histidine kinase from Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Olga Otrusinová; Gabriel Demo; Petr Padrta; Zuzana Jaseňáková; Blanka Pekárová; Zuzana Gelová; Agnieszka Szmitkowska; Pavel Kadeřávek; Séverine Jansen; Milan Zachrdla; Tomáš Klumpler; Jaromír Marek; Jozef Hritz; Lubomír Janda; Hideo Iwaï; Michaela Wimmerová; Jan Hejátko; Lukáš Žídek
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Organization of the Flagellar Switch Complex of Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ward; Eun A Kim; Joseph Panushka; Tayson Botelho; Trevor Meyer; Daniel B Kearns; George Ordal; David F Blair
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Regulation of response regulator autophosphorylation through interdomain contacts.

Authors:  Christopher M Barbieri; Timothy R Mack; Victoria L Robinson; Matthew T Miller; Ann M Stock
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.