Literature DB >> 17050861

Aggregating embryonic but not somatic nuclear transfer embryos increases cloning efficiency in cattle.

Pavla M Misica-Turner1, Fleur C Oback, Michael Eichenlaub, David N Wells, Björn Oback.   

Abstract

Our objectives were to compare the cellular and molecular effects of aggregating bovine embryonic vs. somatic cell nuclear transfer (ECNT vs. SCNT) embryos and to determine whether aggregation can improve cattle cloning efficiency. We reconstructed cloned embryos from: 1) morula-derived blastomeres, 2) six adult male ear skin fibroblast lines, 3) one fetal female lung fibroblast line (BFF), and 4) two transgenic clonal strains derived from BFF. Embryos were cultured either singularly (1X) or as aggregates of three (3X). In vitro-fertilized (IVF) 1X and 3X embryos served as controls. After aggregation, the in vitro development of ECNT but not that of SCNT or IVF embryos was strongly compromised. The inner cell mass (ICM), total cell (TC) numbers, and ICM:TC ratios significantly increased for all the aggregates. The relative concentration of the key embryonic transcript POU5F1 (or OCT4) did not correlate with these increases, remaining unchanged in the ECNT and IVF aggregates and decreasing significantly in the SCNT aggregates. Overall, the IVF and 3X ECNT but not the 1X ECNT embryos had significantly higher relative POU5F1 levels than the SCNT embryos. High POU5F1 levels correlated with high in vivo survival, while no such correlation was noted for the ICM:TC ratios. Development to weaning was more than doubled in the ECNT aggregates (10/51 or 20% vs. 7/85 or 8% for 3X vs. 1X, respectively; P < 0.05). In contrast, the SCNT and IVF controls showed no improvement in survival. These data reveal striking biological differences between embryonic and somatic clones in response to aggregation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17050861     DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.106.050922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Reprod        ISSN: 0006-3363            Impact factor:   4.285


  9 in total

1.  Expression profile of developmentally important genes between hand-made cloned buffalo embryos produced from reprogramming of donor cell with oocytes extract and selection of recipient cytoplast through brilliant cresyl blue staining and in vitro fertilized embryos.

Authors:  Sadeesh Em; Meena Kataria; Balhara S; Ps Yadav
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  DNA methylation patterns in tissues from mid-gestation bovine foetuses produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer show subtle abnormalities in nuclear reprogramming.

Authors:  Christine Couldrey; Rita Sf Lee
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 1.978

3.  A virus-free poly-promoter vector induces pluripotency in quiescent bovine cells under chemically defined conditions of dual kinase inhibition.

Authors:  Ben Huang; Tong Li; Lucia Alonso-Gonzalez; Ruben Gorre; Sarah Keatley; Andria Green; Pavla Turner; Prasanna Kumar Kallingappa; Vinod Verma; Björn Oback
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Factors affecting the development of somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos in Cattle.

Authors:  Satoshi Akagi; Kazutsugu Matsukawa; Seiya Takahashi
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  The aggregation of four reconstructed zygotes is the limit to improve the developmental competence of cloned equine embryos.

Authors:  Andrés Gambini; Adrian De Stefano; Romina Jimena Bevacqua; Florencia Karlanian; Daniel Felipe Salamone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Embryo Aggregation in Pig Improves Cloning Efficiency and Embryo Quality.

Authors:  Carla Paola Buemo; Andrés Gambini; Lucia Natalia Moro; María Inés Hiriart; Rafael Fernández-Martín; Philippe Collas; Daniel Felipe Salamone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Improves the In Vitro Developmental Competence and Reprogramming Efficiency of Cloned Bovine Embryos by Additional Complimentary Cytoplasm.

Authors:  Lianguang Xu; Ayman Mesalam; Kyeong-Lim Lee; Seok-Hwan Song; Imran Khan; M M R Chowdhury; Wenfa Lv; Il-Keun Kong
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.987

8.  Double cytoplast embryonic cloning improves in vitro but not in vivo development from mitotic pluripotent cells in cattle.

Authors:  Sarah Jane Appleby; Pavla Misica-Turner; Fleur Catherine Oback; Arindam Dhali; Zachariah Louis McLean; Björn Oback
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Availability of empty zona pellucida for generating embryonic chimeras.

Authors:  Chi-Hun Park; Young-Hee Jeong; Dong-Kyung Lee; Jae Yeon Hwang; Kyung-Jun Uh; Su-Cheong Yeom; Curie Ahn; Chang-Kyu Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.