OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate intraocular pressure (IOP) levels in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) patients and healthy controls during both the day and night while measuring in an upright as well as in a supine position. METHODS: In a prospective clinical trial, 30 glaucoma patients on topical treatment and 50 healthy controls received IOP measurements every 4 h for a 24 h period starting at 8 am. Additionally, blood pressure and heart rate were measured and perfusion pressures were calculated. At 12 am IOP was initially measured in a sitting position and then, after 20 min, in a supine position. At midnight this was carried out conversely. At 4 am IOP was measured in a supine position; all other measurements were performed in a sitting position. Measurements in the sitting position were performed by Goldmann and Perkins tonometry and in a supine position by Perkins tonometry. RESULTS: IOP was 1 mmHg lower in Perkins tonometry measurements compared to Goldmann tonometry. There was no difference between the two patient groups. In a supine position, IOP measured by Perkins tonometry was higher than in an upright position. At 12 am the difference was 1.8 mmHg+/-2.7 mmHg (p=0.001) in healthy subjects and 1.3+/-2.7 mmHg (p=0.013) in the POAG patients. At 12 pm the increase of IOP in the supine position was even more pronounced with 2.4+/-3.4 mmHg in healthy subjects and 5.6+/-3.2 mmHg in the POAG patients (p=0.001). The blood pressure and the perfusion pressure were lowest during night measurements. CONCLUSIONS: During diurnal IOP measurements in an upright position there were no statistically significant differences in IOP changes between groups. However, in a supine position IOP was significantly higher than in a sitting position and increased more in the glaucoma patients than in healthy controls. This observation might be due to a faulty regulation of the fluid shift in glaucoma patients and could cause progression of glaucomatous damage.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate intraocular pressure (IOP) levels in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) patients and healthy controls during both the day and night while measuring in an upright as well as in a supine position. METHODS: In a prospective clinical trial, 30 glaucomapatients on topical treatment and 50 healthy controls received IOP measurements every 4 h for a 24 h period starting at 8 am. Additionally, blood pressure and heart rate were measured and perfusion pressures were calculated. At 12 am IOP was initially measured in a sitting position and then, after 20 min, in a supine position. At midnight this was carried out conversely. At 4 am IOP was measured in a supine position; all other measurements were performed in a sitting position. Measurements in the sitting position were performed by Goldmann and Perkins tonometry and in a supine position by Perkins tonometry. RESULTS: IOP was 1 mmHg lower in Perkins tonometry measurements compared to Goldmann tonometry. There was no difference between the two patient groups. In a supine position, IOP measured by Perkins tonometry was higher than in an upright position. At 12 am the difference was 1.8 mmHg+/-2.7 mmHg (p=0.001) in healthy subjects and 1.3+/-2.7 mmHg (p=0.013) in the POAG patients. At 12 pm the increase of IOP in the supine position was even more pronounced with 2.4+/-3.4 mmHg in healthy subjects and 5.6+/-3.2 mmHg in the POAG patients (p=0.001). The blood pressure and the perfusion pressure were lowest during night measurements. CONCLUSIONS: During diurnal IOP measurements in an upright position there were no statistically significant differences in IOP changes between groups. However, in a supine position IOP was significantly higher than in a sitting position and increased more in the glaucomapatients than in healthy controls. This observation might be due to a faulty regulation of the fluid shift in glaucomapatients and could cause progression of glaucomatous damage.
Authors: Mae O Gordon; Julia A Beiser; James D Brandt; Dale K Heuer; Eve J Higginbotham; Chris A Johnson; John L Keltner; J Philip Miller; Richard K Parrish; M Roy Wilson; Michael A Kass Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2002-06
Authors: Allison P Anderson; Gautam Babu; Jacob G Swan; Scott D Phillips; Darin A Knaus; Christine M Toutain-Kidd; Michael E Zegans; Abigail M Fellows; Jiang Gui; Jay C Buckey Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2017-05-25
Authors: Stephen J Moster; Ghasem Fakhraie; Rengaraj Venketesh; Mark L Moster; Yuanjun Zhao; Marlene R Moster Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2012-05-11 Impact factor: 2.031
Authors: Mael Lever; Jan Darius Unterlauft; Christian Halfwassen; Nikolaos E Bechrakis; Anke Manthey; Michael R R Böhm Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2020-05-28