Literature DB >> 17046842

The total mesorectal excision specimen for rectal cancer: a review of its pathological assessment.

Jeremy R Parfitt1, David K Driman.   

Abstract

Total mesorectal excision (TME) refers to the surgical removal of the complete perirectal soft tissue envelope, using sharp instruments under direct vision, and has become the contemporary standard of care for patients with rectal cancer. Pathologists play a key role in the evaluation of these specimens, including the quality assurance of surgical performance, as well as evaluation of the circumferential radial margin (CRM). While the latter is the most significant predictor of local recurrence, the quality of the excised mesorectum is another important factor in assessing the risk of local recurrence in patients with a negative CRM. Since proper pathological assessment of the TME specimen provides important prognostic information, as well as critical feedback to surgeons regarding technical performance, it is important to have adequate guidelines for the macroscopic handling of these specimens. The CLASSICC study of the Medical Research Council in the United Kingdom, as well as the Dutch TME trial have introduced a new standard for the pathological assessment of TME specimens, including an approach that involves assessment in both the fresh and fixed states, at least 48 hours of fixation of an intact specimen, with observations made on both the external appearance and cross-sectional slices. This article reviews the pathological assessment of the TME specimen, including basic definitions, current international guidelines, an approach to evaluating the mesorectum and a discussion of special issues relating to margins, lymph node retrieval and effects of neoadjuvant therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17046842      PMCID: PMC1994509          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2006.043802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  36 in total

1.  Disparate surgical margin lengths of colorectal resection specimens between in vivo and in vitro measurements. The effects of surgical resection and formalin fixation on organ shrinkage.

Authors:  N S Goldstein; A Soman; J Sacksner
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  TNM classification: clarification of number of regional lymph nodes for pNo.

Authors:  L H Sobin; F L Greene
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  A Wibe; P R Rendedal; E Svensson; J Norstein; T J Eide; H E Myrvold; O Søreide
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  GEWF solution.

Authors:  K J Newell; B W Sawka; B F Rudrick; D K Driman
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control.

Authors:  Iris D Nagtegaal; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Erik van der Worp; Ellen Kapiteijn; Phil Quirke; J Han J M van Krieken
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  American Joint Committee on Cancer Prognostic Factors Consensus Conference: Colorectal Working Group.

Authors:  C Compton; C M Fenoglio-Preiser; N Pettigrew; L P Fielding
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Impact of number of nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  J E Tepper; M J O'Connell; D Niedzwiecki; D Hollis; C Compton; A B Benson; B Cummings; L Gunderson; J S Macdonald; R J Mayer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit.

Authors:  Iris D Nagtegaal; Corrie A M Marijnen; Elma Klein Kranenbarg; Cornelis J H van de Velde; J Han J M van Krieken
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 9.  Prognosis and response to therapy in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J Walker; P Quirke
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  No downstaging after short-term preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  C A Marijnen; I D Nagtegaal; E Klein Kranenbarg; J Hermans; C J van de Velde; J W Leer; J H van Krieken
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  27 in total

1.  Colorectal Cancer OncoGuia: surgical pathology report guidelines.

Authors:  Xavier Sanjuán; Antonio Salas; Josep Lloreta; Paula Manchon Walsh
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  [Pathological work-up of rectal cancer following partial/total mesorectal excision].

Authors:  K J Schmitz; C Chmelar; E Berg; K W Schmid
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  [Tumors of the lower gastrointestinal tract : Indication and extent of lymph node dissection].

Authors:  S Merkel; K Weber; A Perrakis; J Göhl; W Hohenberger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Endosalpingiosis can mimic malignant glands and result in a false positive mesorectal resection margin.

Authors:  Dimas Suárez-Vilela; Francisco Miguel Izquierdo; Jose Ramón Riera-Velasco; Juliana Escobar-Stein
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  A Comparison of Pathologic Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Resections for Rectal Cancer Using the ACS-NSQIP Proctectomy-Targeted Database: a Propensity Score Analysis.

Authors:  Richard Garfinkle; Maria Abou-Khalil; Sahir Bhatnagar; Nathalie Wong-Chong; Laurent Azoulay; Nancy Morin; Carol-Ann Vasilevsky; Marylise Boutros
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Transanal TATA/TME: a case-matched study of taTME versus laparoscopic TME surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  J H Marks; G A Montenegro; J F Salem; M V Shields; G J Marks
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  CT/MRI pelvimetry as a useful tool when selecting patients with rectal cancer for transanal total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Alexander Ferko; Ondřej Malý; Július Örhalmi; Josef Dolejš
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Perspectives on the treatment of colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Ren Zhao; Jing Li
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2010-05-15

9.  TAMIS-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision in a cadaveric series.

Authors:  Elisabeth C McLemore; Alisa M Coker; Bikash Devaraj; Jeffrey Chakedis; Ali Maawy; Tazo Inui; Mark A Talamini; Santiago Horgan; Michael R Peterson; Patricia Sylla; Sonia Ramamoorthy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Colorectal Cancer Association of Canada consensus meeting: raising the standards of care for early-stage rectal cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.